Nadir Kellou

8 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Nadir Kellou
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 154
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 80
  • Physiology 68
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 26
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
Replace Nevena Chakarova with:
Nevena Chakarova Bulgaria
Inger Katrine Dahl‐Petersen Denmark
Monique A.M. Jacobs-van der Bruggen Netherlands
Kathy Love‐Osborne United States
Nana Kragh Denmark
Janetta Harbron South Africa
Huiqi Li Singapore
Oussama Khatib Egypt
María José Santi-Cano Spain
Joaquín Montero Chile
Nadir Kellou relative to Nevena Chakarova Bulgaria Nevena Chakarova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Nevena Chakarova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadir Kellou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadir Kellou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadir Kellou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadir Kellou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadir Kellou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadir Kellou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadir Kellou. The network helps show where Nadir Kellou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadir Kellou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadir Kellou Line = papers co-authored together Nadir Kellou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2012180
2 201445
3 201441
4 201621
5 201321
6 20118
7 20202
8 20161

About Nadir Kellou

Nadir Kellou is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (154 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (80 citations), Physiology (68 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (26 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations). Nadir Kellou has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Arab Emirates and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alain Moreau, Jean‐Pierre Boissel, Irène Supper, François Gueyffier, Michel Cucherat, Théodora Bejan‐Angoulvant, Rémy Boussageon, Behrouz Kassaï, Catherine Cornu and Nane Copin. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of General Practice, Disability and Rehabilitation, Diabetes & Metabolism, International Journal of Obesity and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact