Nadine Tremblay
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health Information Management top 1%
- Physiology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Josip CarMarie DesmartisMarie‐Pierre GagnonMichel LabrecqueFrance LégaréPierre FrémontPierre PluyeClaudia Pagliari
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers)Marriage and Sexual Relationships (6 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nadine Tremblay
15 papers receiving 669 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- General Health Professions 212
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 113
- Health Information Management 111
- Physiology 102
- Social Psychology 99
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Tremblay
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Tremblay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Tremblay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Tremblay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Tremblay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Tremblay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Tremblay. The network helps show where Nadine Tremblay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadine Tremblay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadine Tremblay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadine Tremblay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadine Tremblay. Nadine Tremblay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionalsbreakdown → | 415 |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 133 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 11 |
About Nadine Tremblay
Nadine Tremblay is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Health Information Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (6 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (111 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations) and Applied Psychology (44 citations). Nadine Tremblay has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Josip Car, Marie Desmartis, Marie‐Pierre Gagnon, Michel Labrecque, France Légaré, Pierre Frémont, Pierre Pluye, Claudia Pagliari, Johanne Gagnon and John Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Transplantation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.