Nadine Taub
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Law top 2%
- Health
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Catherine A. MacKinnonElizabeth M. SchneiderR. Alta CharoLoane SkeneJeremy SugarmanMarion DanisNancy Kass
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper)Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesLawHealth
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nadine Taub
9 papers receiving 342 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Gender Studies 309
- Sociology and Political Science 205
- Law 51
- Health 42
- Political Science and International Relations 38
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Taub
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Taub's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Taub with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Taub more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Taub
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Taub. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Taub. The network helps show where Nadine Taub may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadine Taub
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadine Taub. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadine Taub based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadine Taub. Nadine Taub is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perspectives on Women’s Subordination and the Role of Law | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Amicus brief: In the matter of Baby M. | 1 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Perspectives on Women's Subordination and the Role of Law (and rev. ed. 1990; 3d ed. 1998; reprinted in Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations (D. Kelly Weisberg ed. 1993); excerpted in Gender and Law (K. Bartlett 1993)) | 9 |
| 9 | Keeping Women in their Place: Stereotyping Per Se As a Form of Employment Discrimination | 6 |
| 10 | Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discriminationbreakdown → | 384 |
About Nadine Taub
Nadine Taub is a scholar working on Public Administration, Reproductive Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 10 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (309 citations), Law (51 citations) and Health (42 citations). Nadine Taub has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine A. MacKinnon, Elizabeth M. Schneider, R. Alta Charo, Loane Skene, Jeremy Sugarman, Marion Danis and Nancy Kass. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Journal of Social Issues and Columbia Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.