Acta Biomaterialia

9.6k papers and 526.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.6k papers published in Acta Biomaterialia in the last decades have received a total of 526.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Biomaterialia usually cover Biomedical Engineering (4.6k papers), Biomaterials (3.3k papers) and Surgery (2.3k papers) specifically the topics of Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (2.3k papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1.4k papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (962 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Biomaterialia are Julian R. Jones, Frank Witte, Aldo R. Boccaccını, Sergey V. Dorozhkin, Yufeng Zheng, Stephen F. Badylak, Susmita Bose, Amit Bandyopadhyay, R.D.K. Misra and Jiang Chang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Biomaterialia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Biomaterialia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Biomaterialia.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Biomaterialia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Biomaterialia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Biomaterialia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Biomaterialia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025