Nadia Scantlebury
- Genetics top 2%
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment 8
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurological disorders and treatments 7
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 12
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 10
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 4
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 3
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 3
- Co-authors
- Donald MabbottÉric BouffetSuzanne LaughlinNicole LawMichael D. TaylorNormand LaperrièreIska Moxon‐EmreDavid Malkin
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)PLoS ONE (1 paper)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nadia Scantlebury
31 papers receiving 996 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Genetics 379
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 276
- Neurology 191
- Developmental Neuroscience 50
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 278
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Scantlebury
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Scantlebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Scantlebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Scantlebury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Scantlebury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Scantlebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Scantlebury. The network helps show where Nadia Scantlebury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Scantlebury, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 112 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 29 |
About Nadia Scantlebury
Nadia Scantlebury is a scholar working on Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (379 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (276 citations) and Neurology (191 citations). Nadia Scantlebury has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Donald Mabbott, Éric Bouffet, Suzanne Laughlin, Nicole Law, Michael D. Taylor, Normand Laperrière, Iska Moxon‐Emre, David Malkin, Laura Janzen and Michael L. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.