Nadia Khan
About
In The Last Decade
Nadia Khan
5 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- General Health Professions 199
- Clinical Psychology 189
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 83
- Social Psychology 70
- Applied Psychology 25
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Khan
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Khan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Khan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Khan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Khan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Khan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Khan. The network helps show where Nadia Khan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Khan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Khan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Khan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Khan. Nadia Khan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 310 | |
| 6 | Hepatitis C antibodies in haemodialysis and pattern of end-stage renal failure in Gassim, Saudi Arabia. | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.