Nádia Gonçalves
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Immunology
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Adelino Leite‐MoreiraRoberto Roncon‐AlbuquerqueInês Falcão‐PiresDaniel Moreira‐GonçalvesTiago Henriques‐CoelhoPedro Pimentel‐NunesMário Dinis‐RibeiroLuís Moreira‐Dias
- Topics
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers)Immune Response and Inflammation (6 papers)Apelin-related biomedical research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalNetherlandsBrazil
In The Last Decade
Nádia Gonçalves
24 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 252
- Surgery 205
- Immunology 180
- Molecular Biology 138
- Pharmacology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Nádia Gonçalves
This map shows the geographic impact of Nádia Gonçalves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nádia Gonçalves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nádia Gonçalves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nádia Gonçalves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nádia Gonçalves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nádia Gonçalves. The network helps show where Nádia Gonçalves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nádia Gonçalves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nádia Gonçalves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nádia Gonçalves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nádia Gonçalves. Nádia Gonçalves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 51 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | A high-calorie diet attenuates cachexia and adipose tissue inflammation in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertensive rats. | 2 |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nádia Gonçalves
Nádia Gonçalves is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pharmacology and Immunology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (8 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (6 papers) and Apelin-related biomedical research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (252 citations), Immunology (180 citations) and Pharmacology (129 citations). Nádia Gonçalves has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Netherlands and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Adelino Leite‐Moreira, Roberto Roncon‐Albuquerque, Inês Falcão‐Pires, Daniel Moreira‐Gonçalves, Tiago Henriques‐Coelho, Pedro Pimentel‐Nunes, Mário Dinis‐Ribeiro, Luís Moreira‐Dias, Rui Henrique and Luís Pedro Afonso. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Gastroenterology and Cardiovascular Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.