Nadia D’Ambrosi

3.9k total citations
56 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Nadia D’Ambrosi is a scholar working on Physiology, Neurology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia D’Ambrosi has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Physiology, 27 papers in Neurology and 24 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Nadia D’Ambrosi's work include Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (29 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (24 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (14 papers). Nadia D’Ambrosi is often cited by papers focused on Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (29 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (24 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (14 papers). Nadia D’Ambrosi collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Serbia. Nadia D’Ambrosi's co-authors include Cinzia Volonté, Susanna Amadio, Savina Apolloni, Fabio Cavaliere, Giorgio Bernardi, Maria Concetta Geloso, Maria Teresa Carrı̀, Alessia Serrano, Fabrizio Michetti and Mauro Cozzolino and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Nadia D’Ambrosi

56 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Nadia D’Ambrosi
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Physiology 1.5k
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Neurology 940
  • Neurology 757
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 595
Replace Susanna Amadio with:
Susanna Amadio Italy
Cinzia Volonté Italy
Marta Fumagalli Italy
Miguel Díaz‐Hernández Spain
Hyun B. Choi Canada
Patrizia Di Iorio Italy
Alessia Melani Italy
Maria Luisa Cotrina United States
María Teresa Miras‐Portugal Spain
Karl Asmund Rudolphi Germany
Susanna Amadio Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nadia D’Ambrosi
Nadia D’Ambrosi · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nadia D’Ambrosi
Nadia D’Ambrosi · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia D’Ambrosi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia D’Ambrosi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia D’Ambrosi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia D’Ambrosi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia D’Ambrosi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia D’Ambrosi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia D’Ambrosi. The network helps show where Nadia D’Ambrosi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia D’Ambrosi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia D’Ambrosi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia D’Ambrosi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia D’Ambrosi. Nadia D’Ambrosi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 10
3 2
4 1
5 6
6 6
7 18
8 274
9 130
10 33
11 15
12 46
13 28
14 90
15 24
16 219
17 138
18 60
19 63
20 48

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026