Nadia Angeretti

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Nadia Angeretti is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Angeretti has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Molecular Biology, 12 papers in Physiology and 10 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Nadia Angeretti's work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (13 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers) and Trace Elements in Health (9 papers). Nadia Angeretti is often cited by papers focused on Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (13 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers) and Trace Elements in Health (9 papers). Nadia Angeretti collaborates with scholars based in Italy and United States. Nadia Angeretti's co-authors include Gianluigi Forloni, Mario Salmona, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Roberto Chiesa, Orso Bugiani, Enrico Monzani, Elisa Lucca, Simona Smiroldo, Caterina Bendotti and Maria Grazia De Simoni and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Angeretti

28 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Neurotoxicity of a prion protein fragment 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 250 500 750

Peers

Nadia Angeretti
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Physiology 1.1k
  • Neurology 970
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 579
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 413
M. Azhar Chishti United States
Henrieta Scholtzova United States
Bruno Permanne United States
Agustina Garcı́a Spain
Vincent Émond Canada
John W. Gilbert United States
Dun‐Sheng Yang United States
Matthias Schmitz Germany
Katharina Schindowski Germany
Urszula Wojda Poland
M. Azhar Chishti United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nadia Angeretti
Nadia Angeretti · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nadia Angeretti
Nadia Angeretti · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Angeretti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Angeretti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Angeretti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Angeretti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Angeretti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Angeretti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Angeretti. The network helps show where Nadia Angeretti may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Angeretti

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Angeretti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Angeretti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Angeretti. Nadia Angeretti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 30
2 23
3 130
4 12
5 42
6 16
7 26
8 16
9 74
10 27
11 173
12 66
13
Neurotoxicity of a prion protein fragment breakdown →
797
14 292
15 18
16 16
17 205
18 21
19 7
20 39

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026