N. Müller
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Physiology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Robert T. KnightAxel MecklingerBernhard BaierMarianne DieterichEmrah DüzelKathrin NeumannH.‐O. KarnathMartin Lövdén
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
N. Müller
23 papers receiving 965 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Cognitive Neuroscience 614
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 178
- Psychiatry and Mental health 163
- Physiology 95
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 91
Countries citing papers authored by N. Müller
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Müller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Müller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Müller. The network helps show where N. Müller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Müller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Müller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Müller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Müller. N. Müller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Pharmakologische Therapie der Alzheimer-Demenz: Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven | 1 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 271 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 62 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 299 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About N. Müller
N. Müller is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 987 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (614 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (178 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations). N. Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Knight, Axel Mecklinger, Bernhard Baier, Marianne Dieterich, Emrah Düzel, Kathrin Neumann, H.‐O. Karnath, Martin Lövdén, Ulman Lindenberger and Dörte Ahrens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.