N Menezes

610 total citations
9 papers, 382 citations indexed

About

N Menezes is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, N Menezes has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 382 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 5 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in N Menezes's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers). N Menezes is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers). N Menezes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Brazil. N Menezes's co-authors include C W Imrie, C. McKay, Fiona Eatock, Peter Chong, Lauren Murray, Lorna Marson, C D Auld, Rajesh Kumar, A. Riga and T.R. Worthington and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, British journal of surgery and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

N Menezes

8 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
N Menezes United Kingdom	5	346	182	164	104	30	9	382
Barbara Bielawska Canada	8	175 0.5×	126 0.7×	101 0.6×	78 0.8×	54 1.8×	16	303
Zhiyong Dong China	8	219 0.6×	182 1.0×	138 0.8×	22 0.2×	24 0.8×	13	323
Martin Padar Estonia	7	127 0.4×	77 0.4×	19 0.1×	59 0.6×	43 1.4×	9	213
Hans-Jürgen Richter-Schrag Germany	8	233 0.7×	132 0.7×	53 0.3×	54 0.5×	11 0.4×	13	300
Agamemnon Pericleous United Kingdom	6	198 0.6×	113 0.6×	39 0.2×	15 0.1×	24 0.8×	9	249
J.A. Catton United Kingdom	4	194 0.6×	103 0.6×	71 0.4×	19 0.2×	212 7.1×	6	342
F. Kunzler United States	3	236 0.7×	76 0.4×	142 0.9×	16 0.2×	76 2.5×	6	295
C Casa France	8	251 0.7×	57 0.3×	99 0.6×	10 0.1×	13 0.4×	27	280
Sotiria Everett United States	3	205 0.6×	30 0.2×	25 0.2×	60 0.6×	178 5.9×	4	301
André Kondo Brazil	7	197 0.6×	167 0.9×	78 0.5×	27 0.3×	11 0.4×	11	262

Countries citing papers authored by N Menezes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N Menezes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N Menezes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N Menezes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N Menezes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N Menezes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N Menezes. The network helps show where N Menezes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N Menezes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N Menezes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N Menezes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N Menezes. N Menezes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Menezes, N, et al.. (2023). O ensino de língua adicional em contexto de migração: princípios para o desenho de uma sequência didática para uma sala de aula translíngue. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 22(1). DT3–DT3.

2.

Froghi, Saied, et al.. (2017). Centralisation for resection of the pancreatic head: A comparison of operative factors and early outcomes during the evolving unit and tertiary unit phases at a UK institution. The American Journal of Surgery. 216(2). 310–313. 7 indexed citations

3.

Belgaumkar, Ajay, et al.. (2015). Acute afferent loop syndrome in the early postoperative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 97(5). 349–353. 10 indexed citations

4.

Belgaumkar, Ajay, et al.. (2015). The two-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach for minimal access pancreatic necrosectomy. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 97(5). 354–358. 3 indexed citations

5.

Abbassi‐Ghadi, Nima & N Menezes. (2012). Seldinger method for intraoperative cholangiography: a practical approach. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 94(4). 272–273. 1 indexed citations

6.

Abbassi‐Ghadi, Nima & N Menezes. (2012). Seldinger method for intraoperative cholangiography: a practical approach. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 94(4). 272–273. 1 indexed citations

7.

Eatock, Fiona, Peter Chong, N Menezes, et al.. (2005). A Randomized Study of Early Nasogastric versus Nasojejunal Feeding in Severe Acute Pancreatitis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 100(2). 432–439. 262 indexed citations

8.

Menezes, N, et al.. (2000). Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. British journal of surgery. 87(9). 1176–1181. 89 indexed citations

9.

Imrie, C W, et al.. (1999). Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis and Newer Aspects of Pain Control. Digestion. 60(Suppl. 1). 111–113. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact