Adina L. Roskies
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Dennis D.M. O’LearyD. A. BalotaMarcus E. RaichleTodd McLaughlinSteve PetersenJulie A. FiezPaul YatesWalter Sinnott‐Armstrong
- Topics
- Free Will and Agency (20 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (16 papers)Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
Adina L. Roskies
55 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 444
- Social Psychology 283
- Molecular Biology 180
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
Countries citing papers authored by Adina L. Roskies
This map shows the geographic impact of Adina L. Roskies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adina L. Roskies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adina L. Roskies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adina L. Roskies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adina L. Roskies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adina L. Roskies. The network helps show where Adina L. Roskies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adina L. Roskies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adina L. Roskies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adina L. Roskies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adina L. Roskies. Adina L. Roskies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 85 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 220 | |
| 17 | 193 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 111 |
About Adina L. Roskies
Adina L. Roskies is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (20 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (16 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (113 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (444 citations). Adina L. Roskies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Dennis D.M. O’Leary, D. A. Balota, Marcus E. Raichle, Todd McLaughlin, Steve Petersen, Julie A. Fiez, Paul Yates, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, Shaun Nichols and Aaron Schurger. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.