N. Ganesan
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Development top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Kyaw Yin HlaingRamses AmerJohn LangfordKantha Deivi ArunachalamLeo SuryadinataT. AnithaPrince Winston DavidGurukarthik Babu Balachandran
- Topics
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (18 papers)Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (14 papers)Asian Studies and History (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeIndiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
N. Ganesan
37 papers receiving 155 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Political Science and International Relations 174
- Sociology and Political Science 168
- Development 35
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19
- Strategy and Management 10
Countries citing papers authored by N. Ganesan
This map shows the geographic impact of N. Ganesan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Ganesan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Ganesan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. Ganesan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Ganesan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Ganesan. The network helps show where N. Ganesan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Ganesan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Ganesan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Ganesan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Ganesan. N. Ganesan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | International Relations in Southeast Asia: Between Bilateralism and Multilateralism | 10 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About N. Ganesan
N. Ganesan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Development, having authored 40 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (18 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (14 papers) and Asian Studies and History (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (35 citations), Political Science and International Relations (174 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (168 citations). N. Ganesan has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kyaw Yin Hlaing, Ramses Amer, John Langford, Kantha Deivi Arunachalam, Leo Suryadinata, T. Anitha, Prince Winston David, Gurukarthik Babu Balachandran and V. Balamurugan. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology and Security Dialogue.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.