Security Dialogue

1.1k papers and 23.5k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in Security Dialogue in the last decades have received a total of 23.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Security Dialogue usually cover Sociology and Political Science (693 papers), Political Science and International Relations (490 papers) and Gender Studies (123 papers) specifically the topics of Global Security and Public Health (352 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (249 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (180 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Security Dialogue are Roger Mac Ginty, Paul Roe, Mark Duffield, Claudia Aradau, Jeremy Walker, Melinda Cooper, Jef Huysmans, David Chandler, Didier Bigo and Louise Amoore.

In The Last Decade

Security Dialogue

891 papers receiving 19.4k citations

Countries where authors publish in Security Dialogue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Security Dialogue. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Security Dialogue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Security Dialogue more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Security Dialogue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Security Dialogue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Security Dialogue.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026