Security Dialogue

1.1k papers and 20.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Security Dialogue in the last decades have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Security Dialogue usually cover Sociology and Political Science (686 papers), Political Science and International Relations (493 papers) and Gender Studies (120 papers) specifically the topics of Global Security and Public Health (347 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (251 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (182 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Security Dialogue are Roger Mac Ginty, Paul Roe, Claudia Aradau, Mark Duffield, Melinda Cooper, Jeremy Walker, Jef Huysmans, David Chandler, Louise Amoore and Didier Bigo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Security Dialogue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Security Dialogue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Security Dialogue.

Countries where authors publish in Security Dialogue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Security Dialogue. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Security Dialogue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Security Dialogue more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025