N. G. Porter
- Insect Science top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity 5
-
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 3
- Plant Science top 10%
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 8
- Seed Germination and Physiology 3
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 3
- Garlic and Onion Studies 2
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution 3
-
- Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress 4
- Co-authors
- Emma L. SmithAlex TonksJoan PartonJohn BrazierEdward G. DudleyMartin ShawTamanna SultanaP. F. Wareing
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Botany (2 papers)Journal of Chromatography A (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
N. G. Porter
26 papers receiving 395 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Insect Science 155
- Food Science 154
- Biochemistry 40
- Plant Science 229
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 71
Countries citing papers authored by N. G. Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of N. G. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. G. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. G. Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. G. Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. G. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. G. Porter. The network helps show where N. G. Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. G. Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 143 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 3 | Comparison of flavour compounds in wasabi and horseradish | 2003 | 28 |
| 4 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 5 | Flavour components in the rhizome of soil-grown wasabi. | 2000 | 7 |
| 6 | 1998 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1982 | 15 | |
| 15 | A method for bleaching plant tissue samples prior to scintillation counting. | 1980 | 3 |
| 16 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1966 | 13 |
About N. G. Porter
N. G. Porter is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry and Food Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (8 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (5 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (3 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (3 papers) and Garlic and Onion Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (155 citations), Food Science (154 citations) and Biochemistry (40 citations). N. G. Porter has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emma L. Smith, Alex Tonks, Joan Parton, John Brazier, Edward G. Dudley, Martin Shaw, Tamanna Sultana, P. F. Wareing, G. P. Savage and D. L. McNeil. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Experimental Botany and Journal of Chromatography A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.