N. de Wit
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Infant Health and Development
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 6
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 2
- Surgery 6
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies 6
- Co-authors
- Bohumil Seifert (4 shared papers)Christos Lionis (3 shared papers)A. P. S. Hungin (3 shared papers)Juan Manuel Mendive (3 shared papers)J Foy (2 shared papers)Peter J. Whorwell (2 shared papers)Pierluigi Fracasso (2 shared papers)Catherine Mulligan (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Family Practice (3 papers)Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (3 papers)Nutrition and Diabetes (1 paper)Digestive Diseases and Sciences (1 paper)Critical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
N. de Wit
12 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Gastroenterology 248
- Pharmacy 62
- Food Science 76
- Surgery 146
- Physiology 84
Countries citing papers authored by N. de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of N. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N. de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. de Wit. The network helps show where N. de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 154 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 1 |
About N. de Wit
N. de Wit is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pharmacy and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (6 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (6 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (248 citations), Pharmacy (62 citations), Food Science (76 citations), Surgery (146 citations) and Physiology (84 citations). N. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Bohumil Seifert, Christos Lionis, A. P. S. Hungin, Juan Manuel Mendive, J Foy, Peter J. Whorwell, Pierluigi Fracasso, Catherine Mulligan, Lars Agréus and Christopher Winchester. Their work appears in journals such as Family Practice, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Nutrition and Diabetes, Digestive Diseases and Sciences and Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.