Muhammad Ikram
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Biological Psychiatry top 1%
- Co-authors
- Myeong Ok KimAmjad KhanTahir AliShafiq Ur RehmanTahir MuhammadMuhammad Sohail KhanSayed Ibrar AlamTae Ju Park
- Topics
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (14 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- South KoreaNetherlandsPakistan
In The Last Decade
Muhammad Ikram
58 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Molecular Biology 915
- Physiology 731
- Neurology 554
- Pharmacology 322
- Biological Psychiatry 308
Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Ikram
This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Ikram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Ikram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Ikram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Ikram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Ikram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Ikram. The network helps show where Muhammad Ikram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Muhammad Ikram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Muhammad Ikram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Muhammad Ikram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Muhammad Ikram. Muhammad Ikram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | The Rotterdam Study. Design update and major findings between 2020 and 2024breakdown → | 54 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Studybreakdown → | 316 |
| 15 | 119 | |
| 16 | COMPLICATIONS DURING HEMODIALYSIS IN END STAGE RENAL DISEASE PATIENTS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL | 2 |
| 17 | 150 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 199 | |
| 20 | 165 |
About Muhammad Ikram
Muhammad Ikram is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (14 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (308 citations), Neurology (554 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (292 citations). Muhammad Ikram has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Netherlands and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Myeong Ok Kim, Amjad Khan, Tahir Ali, Shafiq Ur Rehman, Tahir Muhammad, Muhammad Sohail Khan, Sayed Ibrar Alam, Tae Ju Park, Jong Ryeal Hahm and Sareer Ahmad. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.