Muhammad Ghous

4 papers receiving 435 citations

Hit Papers

External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients 2021 · 431 citations
4310+1+3Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Muhammad Ghous
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Health Informatics 191
  • Family Practice 44
  • Health Information Management 54
  • Artificial Intelligence 176
  • Epidemiology 155
Replace Nathan Brajer with:
Nathan Brajer United States
Samson Mataraso United States
Jennifer C. Ginestra United States
H.M. Giannini United States
Katharine E. Henry United States
Chris W. Barton United States
Davy van de Sande Netherlands
Jeremy A. Balch United States
Marta Fernandes United States
Hoyt Burdick United States
Muhammad Ghous relative to Nathan Brajer United States Nathan Brajer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Nathan Brajer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Muhammad Ghous

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Muhammad Ghous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Muhammad Ghous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Muhammad Ghous more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Muhammad Ghous

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Muhammad Ghous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Muhammad Ghous. The network helps show where Muhammad Ghous may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Muhammad Ghous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Muhammad Ghous Line = papers co-authored together Muhammad Ghous links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients
Hit paper breakdown →
2021431
2 202211
3 20242
4 20222
5 20250
6 20250
7 20220

About Muhammad Ghous

Muhammad Ghous is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Strategy and Management, Family Practice and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (1 paper), Seed and Plant Biochemistry (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (1 paper), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (191 citations), Family Practice (44 citations), Health Information Management (54 citations), Artificial Intelligence (176 citations) and Epidemiology (155 citations). Muhammad Ghous has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, United States and Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Erkin Ötleş, Jeffrey S. McCullough, Andrew E. Krumm, M. Phillips, Karandeep Singh, John P. Donnelly, Andrew Wong, Saima Siddiqui, Ubaid ur Rehman and Adriana Rojas. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the American Thoracic Society, JAMA Internal Medicine, Innovation in Aging, Arabian Journal of Geosciences and Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact