Andrew E. Krumm

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
55 papers, 787 citations indexed

About

Andrew E. Krumm is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew E. Krumm has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 787 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 21 papers in Surgery and 17 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Andrew E. Krumm's work include Innovations in Medical Education (24 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (21 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (15 papers). Andrew E. Krumm is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (24 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (21 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (15 papers). Andrew E. Krumm collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Andrew E. Krumm's co-authors include Erkin Ötleş, M. Phillips, Andrew Wong, John P. Donnelly, Jeffrey S. McCullough, Muhammad Ghous, Karandeep Singh, Stephanie D. Teasley, Steven Lonn and Brian C. George and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Computers & Education and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Andrew E. Krumm

44 papers receiving 759 citations

Hit Papers

External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary S... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew E. Krumm United States 10 207 197 155 143 140 55 787
Shaikat Mondal India 13 288 1.4× 143 0.7× 31 0.2× 49 0.3× 91 0.7× 133 757
Tracie Risling Canada 11 300 1.4× 104 0.5× 30 0.2× 61 0.4× 178 1.3× 33 825
David Chartash United States 8 1.1k 5.5× 420 2.1× 56 0.4× 18 0.1× 169 1.2× 25 1.4k
Khalil Kimiafar Iran 14 124 0.6× 62 0.3× 38 0.2× 19 0.1× 116 0.8× 80 692
Arun Vijay Subbarayalu Saudi Arabia 10 197 1.0× 83 0.4× 36 0.2× 44 0.3× 72 0.5× 63 611
Aidan Gilson United States 4 1.1k 5.4× 406 2.1× 38 0.2× 17 0.1× 130 0.9× 14 1.3k
Thomas Huang United States 6 1.1k 5.5× 412 2.1× 36 0.2× 17 0.1× 129 0.9× 13 1.4k
Vimig Socrates United States 7 1.1k 5.5× 426 2.2× 37 0.2× 17 0.1× 156 1.1× 17 1.4k
Cord Spreckelsen Germany 12 24 0.1× 79 0.4× 11 0.1× 273 1.9× 160 1.1× 50 713
Masoumeh Sarbaz Iran 12 118 0.6× 52 0.3× 35 0.2× 20 0.1× 90 0.6× 60 539

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Krumm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Krumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Krumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Krumm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Krumm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Krumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Krumm. The network helps show where Andrew E. Krumm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew E. Krumm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew E. Krumm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew E. Krumm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew E. Krumm. Andrew E. Krumm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Kalpakjian, Claire Z., et al.. (2025). Operationalizing a learning health system: A self‐assessment tool for interprofessional teams. Learning Health Systems. 9(3). e10482–e10482. 1 indexed citations
3.
Krumm, Andrew E., et al.. (2024). Readiness of Graduating General Surgery Residents To Perform Common Pediatric Surgery Procedures. Journal of surgical education. 82(1). 103318–103318.
4.
Krumm, Andrew E., et al.. (2024). Proximity to Practice: The Role of Technology in the Next Era of Assessment. Perspectives on Medical Education. 13(1). 646–653. 2 indexed citations
5.
Krumm, Andrew E., Saad Chahine, Daniel J. Schumacher, et al.. (2024). Digital Evidence: Revisiting Assumptions at the Intersection of Technology and Assessment. Perspectives on Medical Education. 13(1). 553–560.
6.
Sebok‐Syer, Stefanie S., et al.. (2024). Operative Performance and Autonomy Across Training Years: Does a Preliminary Year Matter?. Journal of surgical education. 82(1). 103297–103297.
7.
Noyes, Sabrina L., et al.. (2024). Simplified cardiovascular index may be the best comorbidity index for clinical use in prediction of mortality for renal cancer patients. Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations. 42(3). 72.e1–72.e8.
8.
Krumm, Andrew E., et al.. (2023). Strategies for evaluating predictive models: examples and implications based on a natural language processing model used to assess operative performance feedback. Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education. 3(1). 2 indexed citations
9.
Paget, Charles J., et al.. (2023). Operative experiences of preliminary versus categorical general surgery residents. Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education. 2(1). 1 indexed citations
10.
Thoma, Brent, Maxwell Spadafore, Stefanie S. Sebok‐Syer, et al.. (2023). Considering the Secondary Use of Clinical and Educational Data to Facilitate the Development of Artificial Intelligence Models. Academic Medicine. 99(Supplement_1). S77–S83. 9 indexed citations
11.
George, Brian C., et al.. (2023). Right Case, Right Time: Which Procedures Best Differentiate General Surgery Trainees’ Operative Performance?. Journal of surgical education. 80(11). 1493–1502. 2 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Xilin, et al.. (2023). Variation in Competence of Graduating General Surgery Trainees. Journal of surgical education. 81(1). 17–24.
13.
Chen, Jenny, Brian C. George, Stacey T. Gray, & Andrew E. Krumm. (2023). Predicting Resident Competence for Otolaryngology Key Indicator Procedures. The Laryngoscope. 133(12). 3341–3345. 4 indexed citations
14.
Krumm, Andrew E., et al.. (2023). An Ideal System of Assessment to Support Competency-Based Graduate Medical Education: Key Attributes and Proposed Next Steps. Journal of surgical education. 81(2). 172–177.
15.
George, Brian C., et al.. (2023). Association of Gender and Operative Feedback Quality in Surgical Residents. Journal of surgical education. 80(11). 1516–1521. 6 indexed citations
16.
Penuel, William R., et al.. (2023). Belonging in science classrooms: Investigating its relation to students' contributions and influence in knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 61(1). 228–252. 5 indexed citations
17.
Holmstrom, Amy L., et al.. (2022). Opportunities to Increase Workplace Feedback: A Multi-institutional Examination. Journal of surgical education. 79(6). e124–e129. 3 indexed citations
18.
Ötleş, Erkin, et al.. (2022). Using natural language processing to determine factors associated with high-quality feedback. Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education. 1(1). 5 indexed citations
19.
George, Brian C., et al.. (2021). Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Practice Readiness for General Surgery. Journal of surgical education. 79(2). 295–301. 5 indexed citations
20.
Snow, Erica L., et al.. (2016). Quantifying How Students Use an Online Learning System: A Focus on Transitions and Performance.. Educational Data Mining. 640–641. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026