Moses Hadas

1.5k citations
49 papers · 333 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 18
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 4
    • Ancient Near East History 3
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 3

Moses Hadas

35 papers receiving 179 citations

Peers

Moses Hadas
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Religious studies 63
  • Anthropology 95
  • Archeology 86
  • Classics 23
  • Philosophy 57
Replace Robert G. Hoerber with:
Robert G. Hoerber United States
John Herington
Bernard M. W. Knox United States
G. E. von Grunebaum United States
Cedric H. Whitman
G. M. Kirkwood United Kingdom
Georges Dumézil France
R. J. Zwi Werblowsky Israel
Erich Segal
Leona Ascher
Moses Hadas relative to Robert G. Hoerber United States Robert G. Hoerber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Robert G. Hoerber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Moses Hadas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Moses Hadas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moses Hadas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moses Hadas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Moses Hadas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moses Hadas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moses Hadas. The network helps show where Moses Hadas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Moses Hadas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Moses Hadas Line = papers co-authored together Moses Hadas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195851
2 196141
3 196022
4 195318
5 195218
6 195418
7 195613
8
The complete plays of Aristophanes
198112
9 195912
10 196011
11 195211
12 195411
13 195310
14
The stoic philosophy of Seneca : essays and letters of Seneca
19589
15
Essential Works of Stoicism
19687
16
Three Greek romances
19536
17 19595
18 19515
19 19625
20
An Ethiopian romance
19764

About Moses Hadas

Moses Hadas is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Classics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 49 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (3 papers), Law, logistics, and international trade (3 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (63 citations), Anthropology (95 citations), Archeology (86 citations), Classics (23 citations) and Philosophy (57 citations). Frequent co-authors include Éric Voegelin, Lionel Pearson, Georg Misch, Morton S. Enslin, Lucius Annaeus Seneca, Albin Lesky, Aristophanes, G. M. A. Grube, Theodor H. Gaster and Morton Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, The American Historical Review, Phoenix and Journal of the History of Ideas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact