Lionel Pearson
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 20
- Classical Antiquity Studies 20
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 8
- Co-authors
- Moses Hadas (1 shared paper)A. W. H. Adkins (1 shared paper)James W. Halporn (1 shared paper)Louis H. Feldman (1 shared paper)Joseph Vogt (1 shared paper)Thomas Wiedemann (1 shared paper)Jonathan A. Goldstein (1 shared paper)Virginia Hunter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Philology (11 papers)Phoenix (6 papers)The Classical World (6 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)Classical Philology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lionel Pearson
33 papers receiving 188 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Anthropology 169
- Classics 42
- Archeology 107
- Philosophy 61
- Religious studies 23
Countries citing papers authored by Lionel Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Lionel Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lionel Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lionel Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lionel Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lionel Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lionel Pearson. The network helps show where Lionel Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Lionel Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1951 | 51 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1960 | 23 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1962 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1958 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1952 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1958 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1964 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1954 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 3 |
About Lionel Pearson
Lionel Pearson is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Classics, Archeology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (20 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (6 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers) and Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (169 citations), Classics (42 citations), Archeology (107 citations), Philosophy (61 citations) and Religious studies (23 citations). Lionel Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Moses Hadas, A. W. H. Adkins, James W. Halporn, Louis H. Feldman, Joseph Vogt, Thomas Wiedemann, Jonathan A. Goldstein, Virginia Hunter, M. I. Finley and Richard Kuhns. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Phoenix, The Classical World, The American Historical Review and Classical Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.