Morgane Stempfelet
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morgane Stempfelet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morgane Stempfelet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morgane Stempfelet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Morgane Stempfelet. Morgane Stempfelet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morgane Stempfelet
12 papers receiving 267 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Morgane Stempfelet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morgane Stempfelet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morgane Stempfelet. The network helps show where Morgane Stempfelet may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Morgane Stempfelet
This map shows the geographic impact of Morgane Stempfelet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morgane Stempfelet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morgane Stempfelet more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.