Monika Michel
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Food Science top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Bogusław BuszewskiLuke ChimukaEwa CukrowskaF. FormentiS. CudziłoZbigniew ChyłekTyge GreibrokkMarie‐Claire Hennion
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers)Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (11 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- PolandSouth AfricaLatvia
In The Last Decade
Monika Michel
31 papers receiving 508 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Spectroscopy 201
- Analytical Chemistry 186
- Food Science 112
- Biomedical Engineering 100
- Molecular Biology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Monika Michel
This map shows the geographic impact of Monika Michel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monika Michel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monika Michel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Monika Michel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monika Michel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monika Michel. The network helps show where Monika Michel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monika Michel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monika Michel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monika Michel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monika Michel. Monika Michel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | Hyphenated and unconventional methods for searching volatile cancer biomarkers | 24 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Czy QSRR jest potrzebne chemii analitycznej | 0 |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Isolation, determination and sorption modelling of xenobiotics in plant materials | 7 |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | English and French translation of the keys | 16 |
| 20 | 16 |
About Monika Michel
Monika Michel is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Food Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (14 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (11 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (186 citations), Spectroscopy (201 citations) and Paleontology (58 citations). Monika Michel has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, South Africa and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Bogusław Buszewski, Luke Chimuka, Ewa Cukrowska, F. Formenti, S. Cudziło, Zbigniew Chyłek, Tyge Greibrokk, Marie‐Claire Hennion, Didier Thiébaut and Jérôme Vial. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal of Chromatography A and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.