Monica Feit

10 total papers · 465 total citations
6 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Monica Feit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Monica Feit has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 1 paper in Health. Recurrent topics in Monica Feit's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper). Monica Feit is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper). Monica Feit collaborates with scholars based in South Africa and United Kingdom. Monica Feit's co-authors include Joshua J. Joseph, Youth Board on Children, Families, Anne C. Petersen, Angela Mathee, Brendon Barnes, Shan Naidoo, Trudy Harpham, Sophie Plagerson and Nisha Naicker and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Social Research Methodology and National Academies Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Monica Feit

5 papers receiving 299 citations

Hit Papers

New Directions in Child A... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 50 100 150 200 250

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Monica Feit 254 128 84 64 54 6 322
Karla McPherson 226 0.9× 106 0.8× 59 0.7× 50 0.8× 54 1.0× 6 280
Joseph M. Chandy 304 1.2× 133 1.0× 66 0.8× 78 1.2× 63 1.2× 11 361
Mary Jo Stahlschmidt 243 1.0× 141 1.1× 68 0.8× 30 0.5× 58 1.1× 6 305
Cindy Weisbart 273 1.1× 104 0.8× 59 0.7× 78 1.2× 69 1.3× 12 332
Amalee McCoy 289 1.1× 99 0.8× 43 0.5× 125 2.0× 62 1.1× 7 324
Neil J. Hochstadt 236 0.9× 88 0.7× 132 1.6× 44 0.7× 69 1.3× 10 330
Sandra K. Hewitt 320 1.3× 107 0.8× 95 1.1× 56 0.9× 46 0.9× 6 357
Raeven Faye Chandler 177 0.7× 108 0.8× 23 0.3× 41 0.6× 49 0.9× 4 274
Gretta Cushing 251 1.0× 97 0.8× 126 1.5× 20 0.3× 58 1.1× 8 353
Bomi Kim 220 0.9× 149 1.2× 54 0.6× 64 1.0× 73 1.4× 14 282

Countries citing papers authored by Monica Feit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Feit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Feit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Feit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Feit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Feit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Feit. The network helps show where Monica Feit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monica Feit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monica Feit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monica Feit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monica Feit. Monica Feit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026