Monica Feit

468 citations
6 papers · 322 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 4
Topics
Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers)Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper)
Journals
International Journal of Social Research MethodologyNational Academies Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

Monica Feit

5 papers receiving 299 citations

Hit Papers

New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research2014202620182022201450100150200250

Peers

Monica Feit
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Clinical Psychology 254
  • General Health Professions 128
  • Safety Research 84
  • Health 64
  • Sociology and Political Science 54
Replace Joseph M. Chandy with:
Joseph M. Chandy United States
Megan Feely United States
Wendy Hovdestad Canada
Jina Sang United States
Elizabeth Beatriz United States
Jill D. McLeigh United States
Cindy Weisbart United States
Miriam Maclean Australia
Linda Lewin United States
Aditi Srivastav United States
Monica Feit relative to Joseph M. Chandy United States Joseph M. Chandy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Joseph M. Chandy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Monica Feit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Monica Feit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Monica Feit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Monica Feit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Monica Feit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Monica Feit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Monica Feit. The network helps show where Monica Feit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Monica Feit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Monica Feit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Monica Feit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Monica Feit. Monica Feit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Researchbreakdown →
281
2
Consequences of Child Abuse and Neglect
7
3
Child Abuse and Neglect Policy
2
4
COMMITTEE ON CHILD MALTREATMENT RESEARCH, POLICY, AND PRACTICE FOR THE NEXT DECADE: PHASE II
4
5
Interventions and Service Delivery Systems
1
6 27

About Monica Feit

Monica Feit is a scholar working on Safety Research, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (254 citations), Safety Research (84 citations) and Health (64 citations). Monica Feit has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Joshua J. Joseph, Anne C. Petersen, Families, Sophie Plagerson, Youth Board on Children, Brendon Barnes, Trudy Harpham, Nisha Naicker, Shan Naidoo and Angela Mathee. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Research Methodology and National Academies Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026