New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research
- Journal
- National Academies Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.17226/18331 →Countries where authors are citing New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research
This map shows the geographic impact of New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research
This network shows the impact of New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research.
About New Directions in Child Abuse and Neglect Research
This paper, published in 2014, received 281 indexed citations . Written by Anne C. Petersen, Joshua J. Joseph, Monica Feit and Families covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (243 citations), General Health Professions (115 citations) and Safety Research (78 citations). Published in National Academies Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.17226/18331.