Mongolia

511 total citations
5 papers, 8 citations indexed

About

Mongolia is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Neurology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mongolia has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 8 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations, 1 paper in Neurology and 1 paper in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mongolia's work include Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (1 paper), Coal and Coke Industries Research (1 paper) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper). Mongolia is often cited by papers focused on Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (1 paper), Coal and Coke Industries Research (1 paper) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper). Mongolia collaborates with scholars based in . Mongolia's co-authors include Dongsheng, Liang Liang, Jun Jun, Hồng, Dominican Republic, Xing, Kazakhstan, Wang, Russian Federation and Việt Nam and has published in prestigious journals such as .

In The Last Decade

Mongolia

4 papers receiving 7 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mongolia	2	3	2	2	2	1	5	8
Shannon Wilson United States	2	3 1.0×		2 1.0×			4	14
Lady Grey Javela Colombia	2	2 0.7×		2 1.0×			6	6
Paul Brantom	2	3 1.0×					5	5
Sandra Rainieri	2	2 0.7×		2 1.0×			3	7
H. J. Jang South Korea	2	3 1.0×		1 0.5×			3	8
Y. Sano Japan	3	2 0.7×					6	13
ALFRED W. BENNETT	2	2 0.7×			1 0.5×		2	7
Kunal Garg Italy	2	2 0.7×					4	7
Koffi Abdoul Ivory Coast	1	2 0.7×					3	2
M. De Wit Germany	2	2 0.7×					7	6

Countries citing papers authored by Mongolia

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mongolia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mongolia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mongolia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mongolia

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mongolia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mongolia. The network helps show where Mongolia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mongolia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mongolia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mongolia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mongolia. Mongolia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Mongolia. (2020). Indigenous Peoples Plan. 1–24. 1 indexed citations

2.

Republic, Dominican, et al.. (2019). International Day of Awareness of Food Loss and Waste. 4 indexed citations

3.

Kazakhstan, et al.. (2013). The role of the international community in averting the radiation threat in Central Asia. 1 indexed citations

4.

Mongolia. (2004). Mongolia - Second Ulaanbaatar Services Improvement Project. 1–96. 1 indexed citations

5.

Wang, Bao, Jun Jun, et al.. (1995). Methods of Improving Therapeutic Effect of Electroacupuncture in Peripheral Facial Paralysis. 303–305. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact