Molly Ladd‐Taylor
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- History top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Theda SkocpolLauri UmanskyBarbara MeloshEdward J. LarsonJudith Walzer LeavittMichael B. KatzJulia GrantSonya Michel
- Topics
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (14 papers)Medical History and Research (7 papers)Canadian Identity and History (4 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe American Historical ReviewJournal of American History
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Molly Ladd‐Taylor
26 papers receiving 529 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Sociology and Political Science 340
- History 219
- Political Science and International Relations 123
- Gender Studies 116
- Clinical Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Molly Ladd‐Taylor
This map shows the geographic impact of Molly Ladd‐Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molly Ladd‐Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molly Ladd‐Taylor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Molly Ladd‐Taylor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Molly Ladd‐Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Molly Ladd‐Taylor. The network helps show where Molly Ladd‐Taylor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Molly Ladd‐Taylor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Molly Ladd‐Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Molly Ladd‐Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Molly Ladd‐Taylor. Molly Ladd‐Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Sterilizing the “Retarded” : Feminism, the Courts, and Historical Memory | 1 |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 177 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Molly Ladd‐Taylor
Molly Ladd‐Taylor is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science and Public Administration, having authored 30 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (14 papers), Medical History and Research (7 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (219 citations), Public Administration (54 citations) and Gender Studies (116 citations). Molly Ladd‐Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Theda Skocpol, Lauri Umansky, Barbara Melosh, Edward J. Larson, Judith Walzer Leavitt, Michael B. Katz, Julia Grant, Sonya Michel, Seth Koven and Linda Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.