Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 2%
- Materials Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas W. PanuntoMargaret C. EtterZ. Urbańczyk-LipkowskaLarry C. BlaszczakJames AikinsMichael S. VanNieuwenhzeScott C. MauldinJames R. Henry
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers)Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers)Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyChemistry of MaterialsMolecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
11 papers receiving 813 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Molecular Biology 374
- Organic Chemistry 368
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 195
- Materials Chemistry 151
- Inorganic Chemistry 150
Countries citing papers authored by Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
This map shows the geographic impact of Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi. The network helps show where Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi. Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 165 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | 39 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Hydrogen bond-directed cocrystallization and molecular recognition properties of diarylureasbreakdown → | 452 |
About Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi
Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Molecular Medicine and Spectroscopy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 846 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (195 citations), Organic Chemistry (368 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (150 citations). Mohammad Zia‐Ebrahimi has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas W. Panunto, Margaret C. Etter, Z. Urbańczyk-Lipkowska, Larry C. Blaszczak, James Aikins, Michael S. VanNieuwenhze, Scott C. Mauldin, James R. Henry, Weiying Li and Laura J. Bloem. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemistry of Materials and Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.