Mog Stapleton
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Representations and Identity
Papers in
-
- Embodied and Extended Cognition 3
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 2
- Co-authors
- Evan Thompson (1 shared paper)Catrin Misselhorn (1 shared paper)Dave Ward (1 shared paper)Laura Candiotto (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Topoi (2 papers)Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (1 paper)Cognitive Systems Research (1 paper)Adaptive Behavior (1 paper)Teaching Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Mog Stapleton
9 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 236
- Social Psychology 172
- Philosophy 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
- History and Philosophy of Science 17
Countries citing papers authored by Mog Stapleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Mog Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mog Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mog Stapleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mog Stapleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mog Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mog Stapleton. The network helps show where Mog Stapleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mog Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 263 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 4 | How the body narrows the interaction with the environment | 2016 | 3 |
| 5 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 |
About Mog Stapleton
Mog Stapleton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 9 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution (1 paper), Ego Development and Educational Practices (1 paper), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (236 citations), Social Psychology (172 citations), Philosophy (52 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations). Mog Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Evan Thompson, Catrin Misselhorn, Dave Ward and Laura Candiotto. Their work appears in journals such as Topoi, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Cognitive Systems Research, Adaptive Behavior and Teaching Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.