Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Lie symmetry analysis, soliton solutions and qualitative analysis concerning to the generalized q-deformed Sinh-Gordon equation
Countries citing papers authored by M.L. Gandarias
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M.L. Gandarias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.L. Gandarias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.L. Gandarias more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.L. Gandarias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.L. Gandarias. The network helps show where M.L. Gandarias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.L. Gandarias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.L. Gandarias.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.L. Gandarias based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M.L. Gandarias. M.L. Gandarias is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anco, Stephen C., et al.. (2019). Line solitons and conservation laws of a modified KP equation with p-power nonlinearities. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Estévez, P.G., M.L. Gandarias, & Javier de Lucas. (2013). 1 Classical Lie symmetries and reductions of a nonisospectral Lax pair.1 indexed citations
10.
Gandarias, M.L. & M. S. Bruzón. (2012). Conservation laws for a third order equation by using free software MAXIMA. International Conference on Software Engineering. 48–51.1 indexed citations
11.
Bruzón, M. S. & M.L. Gandarias. (2011). Some travelling wave solutions for a generalized Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers equation by using MAXIMA program. International Conference on Software Engineering. 138–143.1 indexed citations
12.
Gandarias, M.L. & M. S. Bruzón. (2011). Symmetries and conservation laws for a subclass of lubrication equations by using free software. International Conference on Software Engineering. 153–159.1 indexed citations
13.
Bruzón, M. S. & M.L. Gandarias. (2010). Symmetries analysis of a mathematic model with a MACSYMA program. International Conference on Software Engineering. 196–200.2 indexed citations
14.
Gandarias, M.L. & M. S. Bruzón. (2010). Travelling wave solutions for a generalized Boussinesq equation by using free software. International Conference on Software Engineering. 209–213.3 indexed citations
15.
Bruzón, M. S. & M.L. Gandarias. (2010). Classical potential symmetries of the K(m, n) equation with generalized evolution term. WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics archive. 9(4). 275–284.8 indexed citations
Bruzón, M. S. & M.L. Gandarias. (2010). Classification of potential symmetries of the K(m, n) equation with generalized evolution term. 570–574.2 indexed citations
Gandarias, M.L.. (2008). Similarity solutions for a generalized lubrication equation. International Conference on System Science and Simulation in Engineering. 195–199.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.