Mitchell Oler

493 total citations
10 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

Mitchell Oler is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mitchell Oler has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Accounting, 4 papers in Management Information Systems and 3 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mitchell Oler's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers). Mitchell Oler is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (9 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (4 papers). Mitchell Oler collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Mitchell Oler's co-authors include Christopher J. Skousen, Derek Oler, Ryan J. Wilson, Terry Shevlin, J. Gregory Jenkins and Chang Joon Song and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Accounting Research, Accounting Horizons and Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.

In The Last Decade

Mitchell Oler

10 papers receiving 258 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mitchell Oler United States	6	254	127	46	34	18	10	279
Nathaniel M. Stephens United States	10	271 1.1×	156 1.2×	24 0.5×	46 1.4×	14 0.8×	17	325
Hannu Ojala Finland	9	208 0.8×	55 0.4×	52 1.1×	65 1.9×	8 0.4×	31	257
Stefano Cascino United Kingdom	9	184 0.7×	69 0.5×	51 1.1×	79 2.3×	13 0.7×	21	244
Sandip Dhole Australia	8	213 0.8×	54 0.4×	48 1.0×	87 2.6×	15 0.8×	17	266
Lois Munro Australia	7	293 1.2×	49 0.4×	25 0.5×	95 2.8×	9 0.5×	10	328
Anton Miglo United Kingdom	8	133 0.5×	103 0.8×	96 2.1×	42 1.2×	11 0.6×	45	212
Alain Burlaud France	7	120 0.5×	102 0.8×	14 0.3×	69 2.0×	31 1.7×	32	231
Nicole S. Wright United States	6	159 0.6×	48 0.4×	14 0.3×	39 1.1×	11 0.6×	13	192
Kay W. Tatum United States	6	389 1.5×	71 0.6×	28 0.6×	117 3.4×	7 0.4×	7	418
Kevin T. Rich United States	10	196 0.8×	42 0.3×	106 2.3×	40 1.2×	25 1.4×	19	251

Countries citing papers authored by Mitchell Oler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mitchell Oler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mitchell Oler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mitchell Oler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mitchell Oler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mitchell Oler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mitchell Oler. The network helps show where Mitchell Oler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mitchell Oler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mitchell Oler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mitchell Oler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mitchell Oler. Mitchell Oler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Jenkins, J. Gregory, et al.. (2017). Getting Comfortable on Audits: Understanding Firms’ Usage of Forensic Specialists. Contemporary Accounting Research. 35(4). 1766–1797. 43 indexed citations

2.

Oler, Mitchell, et al.. (2016). Perverse market rewards for meeting or beating earnings expectations. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics. 25(1-2). 57–74. 3 indexed citations

3.

Oler, Derek, et al.. (2015). Has Concentration in the Top Accounting Journals Changed Over Time?. Accounting Horizons. 30(1). 63–78. 36 indexed citations

4.

Oler, Mitchell. (2014). Determinants of the length of time a firm’s book-to-market ratio is greater than one. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 45(3). 509–539. 1 indexed citations

5.

Oler, Mitchell. (2014). Accounting standard’s effectiveness on equity overstatement – Conservatism when it matters. Research in Accounting Regulation. 26(1). 75–82. 1 indexed citations

6.

Oler, Derek, et al.. (2012). Has Concentration in the Top Six Accounting Journals Changed Over Time?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

7.

Oler, Mitchell. (2011). Entrenched Management and the Adaptation Option. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

8.

Oler, Derek, Mitchell Oler, & Christopher J. Skousen. (2010). Characterizing Accounting Research. Accounting Horizons. 24(4). 635–670. 115 indexed citations

9.

Oler, Derek, Mitchell Oler, & Christopher J. Skousen. (2009). Characterizing Accounting Research. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations

10.

Oler, Mitchell, Terry Shevlin, & Ryan J. Wilson. (2007). Examining Investor Expectations Concerning Tax Savings on the Repatriations of Foreign Earnings under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. Journal of the American Taxation Association. 29(2). 25–55. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact