Mischa V. Bandet

668 total citations
10 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

Mischa V. Bandet is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mischa V. Bandet has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Mischa V. Bandet's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers). Mischa V. Bandet is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers). Mischa V. Bandet collaborates with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Mischa V. Bandet's co-authors include Ian R. Winship, Douglas R. Wylie, Andrew N. Iwaniuk, Thomas J. Lisney, Roger Thompson, Alexander W. Lohman, Michael A. Colicos, G. Campbell Teskey, Brooke D. Rakai and Lucas Scott and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, Nature Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mischa V. Bandet

10 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mischa V. Bandet Canada 7 204 163 95 80 65 10 485
Rory Spence United States 11 142 0.7× 109 0.7× 206 2.2× 210 2.6× 54 0.8× 13 784
Keiji Ishii Japan 11 163 0.8× 133 0.8× 75 0.8× 41 0.5× 87 1.3× 15 752
Grit Taschenberger Germany 16 211 1.0× 183 1.1× 79 0.8× 104 1.3× 76 1.2× 17 694
R. Cabo Spain 15 212 1.0× 121 0.7× 27 0.3× 44 0.6× 110 1.7× 30 542
Hans J. ten Donkelaar Netherlands 16 307 1.5× 262 1.6× 83 0.9× 28 0.3× 116 1.8× 32 856
Maria N. Pavlova United States 15 566 2.8× 163 1.0× 65 0.7× 37 0.5× 82 1.3× 26 928
Katarzyna Bartkowska Poland 11 167 0.8× 198 1.2× 94 1.0× 16 0.2× 51 0.8× 25 563
Joan Carreres Polo Spain 9 76 0.4× 90 0.6× 61 0.6× 88 1.1× 47 0.7× 33 396
Marı́a Loscertales United States 13 313 1.5× 140 0.9× 58 0.6× 39 0.5× 46 0.7× 15 1.0k
G Martinelli United States 13 81 0.4× 103 0.6× 170 1.8× 37 0.5× 65 1.0× 28 444

Countries citing papers authored by Mischa V. Bandet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mischa V. Bandet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mischa V. Bandet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mischa V. Bandet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mischa V. Bandet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mischa V. Bandet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mischa V. Bandet. The network helps show where Mischa V. Bandet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mischa V. Bandet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mischa V. Bandet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mischa V. Bandet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mischa V. Bandet. Mischa V. Bandet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
3.
Bandet, Mischa V., Bin Dong, & Ian R. Winship. (2021). Distinct patterns of activity in individual cortical neurons and local networks in primary somatosensory cortex of mice evoked by square-wave mechanical limb stimulation. PLoS ONE. 16(4). e0236684–e0236684. 3 indexed citations
4.
Li, Yaqing, Ana M. Lucas‐Osma, Mischa V. Bandet, et al.. (2017). Pericytes impair capillary blood flow and motor function after chronic spinal cord injury. Nature Medicine. 23(6). 733–741. 129 indexed citations
5.
Weilinger, Nicholas L., Alexander W. Lohman, Brooke D. Rakai, et al.. (2016). Metabotropic NMDA receptor signaling couples Src family kinases to pannexin-1 during excitotoxicity. Nature Neuroscience. 19(3). 432–442. 201 indexed citations
6.
Alles, Sascha R.A., Mischa V. Bandet, Ian R. Winship, et al.. (2016). Acute anti-allodynic action of gabapentin in dorsal horn and primary somatosensory cortex: Correlation of behavioural and physiological data. Neuropharmacology. 113(Pt A). 576–590. 19 indexed citations
7.
Ma, Yonglie, et al.. (2016). Prevention of the collapse of pial collaterals by remote ischemic perconditioning during acute ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 37(8). 3001–3014. 45 indexed citations
8.
Lisney, Thomas J., et al.. (2012). Interspecifc variation in eye shape and retinal topography in seven species of galliform bird (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 198(10). 717–731. 31 indexed citations
9.
Lisney, Thomas J., Andrew N. Iwaniuk, Mischa V. Bandet, & Douglas R. Wylie. (2012). Eye Shape and Retinal Topography in Owls (Aves: Strigiformes). Brain Behavior and Evolution. 79(4). 218–236. 48 indexed citations
10.
Sakai, Sharleen T., Craig D. Hardman, Ken W.S. Ashwell, et al.. (2012). Book Review. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 79(4). 290–292. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026