This map shows the geographic impact of Mirjam Minor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mirjam Minor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mirjam Minor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mirjam Minor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mirjam Minor. The network helps show where Mirjam Minor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mirjam Minor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mirjam Minor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mirjam Minor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mirjam Minor. Mirjam Minor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Minor, Mirjam, et al.. (2011). InverseWorkflows for Supporting Agile Business Process Management.. 204–213.4 indexed citations
9.
Minor, Mirjam, et al.. (2009). FALLSTUDIE ZUM EINSATZ AGILER, PROZESSORIENTIERTER METHODEN IN DER CHIPINDUSTRIE. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. 193–202.1 indexed citations
10.
Minor, Mirjam, et al.. (2009). Demonstration of the Agile Workflow Management System CAKE II Based on Long-Term Office Workflows..3 indexed citations
11.
Minor, Mirjam, et al.. (2008). XML-based Representation of Agile Workflows.. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.