This map shows the geographic impact of Stef Joosten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stef Joosten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stef Joosten more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stef Joosten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stef Joosten. The network helps show where Stef Joosten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stef Joosten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stef Joosten.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stef Joosten based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stef Joosten. Stef Joosten is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (2013). Using ampersand in IT archi¬tecture.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
4.
Dijkman, Remco & Stef Joosten. (2002). Deriving use case diagrams from business process models. University of Twente Research Information.12 indexed citations
5.
Dijkman, Remco & Stef Joosten. (2002). An Algorithm to Derive Use Cases from Business Processes. University of Twente Research Information. 679–684.6 indexed citations
6.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (2002). Praktijkboek voor Procesarchitecten. University of Twente Research Information.4 indexed citations
7.
Dijkman, Remco, Luís Ferreira Pires, & Stef Joosten. (2001). Calculating with Concepts: a Technique for the Development of Business Process Support. University of Twente Research Information. 87–98.9 indexed citations
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (1996). Method Engineering and Meta-Modelling. Special Issue. Information and Software Technology. Information and Software Technology. 38(2). 259–259.7 indexed citations
11.
Schipper, Maria & Stef Joosten. (1996). A validation procedure for information systems modeling techniques. University of Twente Research Information.3 indexed citations
12.
Joosten, Stef. (1996). Teaching Workflow Management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 871–873.1 indexed citations
13.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (1996). Representing workflow management systems with smart objects. University of Twente Research Information.5 indexed citations
Terlouw, Kees, et al.. (1995). Tele-Project Groups in Education. University of Twente Research Information.2 indexed citations
16.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (1995). Fundamental Concepts for Workflow Automation in Practice. University of Twente Research Information. 1995. 311–322.3 indexed citations
17.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (1995). The contribution of groupware to corporate communication: Towards the horizontial organization.. European Conference on Information Systems. 649–664.1 indexed citations
18.
Joosten, Stef. (1994). Meta-modelling in a functional language. University of Twente Research Information. 94(10). 1–18.1 indexed citations
19.
Joosten, Stef, et al.. (1994). Workflow Literature Guide. University of Twente Research Information. 94(51). 1–73.1 indexed citations
20.
Joosten, Stef. (1990). Book review: Functional programming / Anthony J. Field, Peter G. Harrison. - Wokingham : Addison-Wesley, 1988. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 32(2). 1–6.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.