Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Choices of Degree or Degrees of Choice? Class, `Race' and the Higher Education Choice Process
2001420 citationsDiane Reay, Jacqueline Davies et al.Sociologyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Miriam David's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miriam David with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miriam David more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miriam David. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miriam David. The network helps show where Miriam David may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miriam David
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miriam David.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miriam David based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Miriam David. Miriam David is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
David, Miriam, et al.. (2007). Get Real About Sex: The Politics and Practice of Sex Education. UCL Discovery (University College London). 268(24). 2978–81.117 indexed citations
Reay, Diane, Miriam David, & Stephen J. Ball. (2005). Degrees of Choice: social class, race and gender in higher education. UCL Discovery (University College London).449 indexed citations
10.
Reay, Diane, Miriam David, & Stephen J. Ball. (2005). Degrees of choice : class, race, gender and higher education.192 indexed citations
11.
Alldred, Pam, et al.. (2003). Teachers’ views of teaching sex education: pedagogies and models of delivery. Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London). 4(1).20 indexed citations
Reay, Diane, Jacqueline Davies, Miriam David, & Stephen J. Ball. (2001). Choices of Degree or Degrees of Choice? Class, `Race' and the Higher Education Choice Process. Sociology. 35(4). 855–874.420 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.