Mirae Kim

817 total citations
43 papers, 571 citations indexed

About

Mirae Kim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Mirae Kim has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 571 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Public Administration and 9 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Mirae Kim's work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (37 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (13 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (9 papers). Mirae Kim is often cited by papers focused on Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (37 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (13 papers) and Community Development and Social Impact (9 papers). Mirae Kim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Mirae Kim's co-authors include Dyana P. Mason, Shuyang Peng, Jamie Levine Daniel, Sanjay K. Pandey, Margaret F. Sloan, Étienne Charbonneau, Sheela Pandey, Chengxin Xu, Bo Li and Marc Holzer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Public Administration Review and Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Mirae Kim

35 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mirae Kim United States 16 429 140 128 102 92 43 571
Kate Cooney United States 12 240 0.6× 102 0.7× 87 0.7× 116 1.1× 102 1.1× 17 515
Jiahuan Lu United States 16 519 1.2× 171 1.2× 210 1.6× 40 0.4× 98 1.1× 53 697
Lewis Faulk United States 13 377 0.9× 104 0.7× 78 0.6× 72 0.7× 71 0.8× 26 476
Urs Jäger Costa Rica 11 394 0.9× 166 1.2× 90 0.7× 171 1.7× 83 0.9× 29 553
Muhittin Acar Türkiye 7 327 0.8× 130 0.9× 202 1.6× 64 0.6× 57 0.6× 18 570
Georg von Schnurbein Switzerland 13 406 0.9× 114 0.8× 64 0.5× 100 1.0× 78 0.8× 56 565
Keely Jones Stater United States 6 353 0.8× 97 0.7× 67 0.5× 65 0.6× 112 1.2× 9 481
David Suárez United States 19 678 1.6× 142 1.0× 234 1.8× 69 0.7× 80 0.9× 26 856
Woods Bowman United States 9 435 1.0× 127 0.9× 58 0.5× 60 0.6× 123 1.3× 10 558
Thomas H. Pollak United States 9 364 0.8× 88 0.6× 63 0.5× 49 0.5× 68 0.7× 14 514

Countries citing papers authored by Mirae Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mirae Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mirae Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mirae Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mirae Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mirae Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mirae Kim. The network helps show where Mirae Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mirae Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mirae Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mirae Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mirae Kim. Mirae Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Faulk, Lewis, Mirae Kim, & Heather MacIndoe. (2025). Bounded Rationality: The Role of Knowledge of Regulations in Nonprofits’ Engagement in Policy Advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum. 17(1-2). 15–42.
2.
Pu, Calton, et al.. (2025). Challenges and Experiences in Data Integration to Support Research on Nonprofit Organizations. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology. 25(4). 1–15.
3.
Kim, Mirae, Heather MacIndoe, & Lewis Faulk. (2025). How Revenue Sources Impact Nonprofit Advocacy: Complementary, Supplementary, and Adversarial Policy Engagement. Public Administration Review. 86(1). 125–142.
4.
Faulk, Lewis & Mirae Kim. (2025). 1 in 3 US nonprofits that serve communities lost government funding in early 2025. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kim, Mirae & Stefan Toepler. (2024). Nonprofits into the core? An early assessment of potential curricular changes after the 2019 NASPAA standards amendments. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 31(4). 469–481.
6.
Peng, Shuyang, et al.. (2024). Who Cares About Nonprofit Reputation: Individual Differences in the Relationship Between Nonprofit Reputation and Charitable Giving. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 35(3). 607–626.
7.
Kim, Mirae, et al.. (2023). Volume II: A Changing Third Sector Research Landscape—Progress or Pitfall?. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 34(1). 4–11. 2 indexed citations
8.
Kim, Mirae, et al.. (2022). Globalizing the Field by Learning from Non-English-Based Nonprofit Studies: A Review of South Korean Nonprofit Literature. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 34(6). 1184–1197. 5 indexed citations
9.
Kim, Mirae, et al.. (2022). Taking Stock on How We Research the Third Sector: Diversity, Pluralism, and Openness. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 33(6). 1107–1113. 8 indexed citations
10.
Kim, Mirae & Bo Li. (2022). Financial Challenges of Nonprofits Serving People of Color: Original Survey Results. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 52(5). 1145–1168. 8 indexed citations
11.
Abramson, Alan J., Mirae Kim, & Stefan Toepler. (2021). Staying the Course: Editorial Statement on the Future Direction of Nonprofit Policy Forum. Nonprofit Policy Forum. 12(3). 401–408. 2 indexed citations
12.
Kim, Mirae & Dyana P. Mason. (2021). Research note: Bridging the gaps between the theory and practice of nonprofit operating reserves. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 32(4). 669–682. 3 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Mirae & Dyana P. Mason. (2020). Are You Ready: Financial Management, Operating Reserves, and the Immediate Impact of COVID-19 on Nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 49(6). 1191–1209. 77 indexed citations
14.
Mason, Dyana P. & Mirae Kim. (2020). A Board Coaching Framework for Effective Nonprofit Governance: Staff Support, Board Knowledge, and Board Effectiveness. Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance. 44(5). 452–468. 3 indexed citations
15.
Peng, Shuyang, et al.. (2019). The Effects of Nonprofit Reputation on Charitable Giving: A Survey Experiment. VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 30(4). 811–827. 33 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Mirae & Jamie Levine Daniel. (2019). Common Source Bias, Key Informants, and Survey-Administrative Linked Data for Nonprofit Management Research. Public Performance & Management Review. 43(1). 232–256. 20 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Mirae, et al.. (2017). Do Mission Statements Matter for Nonprofit Performance?. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 27(3). 389–410. 43 indexed citations
18.
Holzer, Marc, et al.. (2017). Obstacles and Opportunities for Sustaining Performance Management Systems. International Journal of Public Administration. 42(2). 132–143. 15 indexed citations
19.
Kim, Mirae. (2016). Characteristics of Civically Engaged Nonprofit Arts Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 46(1). 175–198. 23 indexed citations
20.
Kim, Mirae, et al.. (2016). Assessing the strength and weakness of the dataarts cultural data profile in comparison with the nccs 990 data. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management. 28(3). 337–360. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026