Ming‐Hui Wen

27 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

Ming‐Hui Wen
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Human-Computer Interaction 220
  • Information Systems and Management 86
  • Social Psychology 213
  • Sociology and Political Science 379
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 105
Replace Chad C. Tossell with:
Chad C. Tossell United States
Fabio Pianesi Italy
Duncan P. Brumby United Kingdom
Lora Oehlberg Canada
Robin Brewer United States
Kraig Finstad United States
Henriette Cramer United States
Ching‐Hua Chuan United States
Ronald Schroeter Australia
Danielle Lottridge New Zealand
Ming‐Hui Wen relative to Chad C. Tossell United States Chad C. Tossell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Chad C. Tossell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Hui Wen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Hui Wen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Hui Wen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Hui Wen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Hui Wen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Hui Wen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Hui Wen. The network helps show where Ming‐Hui Wen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Hui Wen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Hui Wen Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Hui Wen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009321
2 2009226
3 2004181
4 201870
5 201035
6 201722
7 201621
8 202316
9 202316
10 201813
11 200711
12 201610
13 20188
14 20178
15 20078
16 20074
17
Developing an iBeacon-based ubiquitous learning environment in smart green building courses
20163
18 20173
19 20173
20 20122

About Ming‐Hui Wen

Ming‐Hui Wen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 29 papers that have together received 990 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), IoT-based Smart Home Systems (3 papers) and Digital Games and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (220 citations), Information Systems and Management (86 citations), Social Psychology (213 citations), Sociology and Political Science (379 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (105 citations). Ming‐Hui Wen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Yung‐Ching Liu, Nicholas Yee, Greg Wadley, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Muh-Cherng Wu, Shang Hwa Hsu, Jon‐Chao Hong, Ping‐Kuo Chen, Yong Ye and Mochen Yang. Their work appears in journals such as EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Expert Systems with Applications, Production and Operations Management, International journal of engineering education and Journal of Knowledge Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact