Ming‐Hsien Chen

13 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Ming‐Hsien Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
  • Clinical Psychology 148
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 27
  • Rehabilitation 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 75
Replace Luis Montesinos with:
Luis Montesinos Mexico
Natalie M. Golaszewski United States
Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan Brazil
Amir Muaremi Switzerland
Angiola Maria Fasanaro Italy
Katherine Beissner United States
Fahd Albinali United States
Dongmei Wu China
Anna Carotenuto Italy
Tiffany Tong Canada
Ming‐Hsien Chen relative to Luis Montesinos Mexico Luis Montesinos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Luis Montesinos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Hsien Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Hsien Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Hsien Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Hsien Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Hsien Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Hsien Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Hsien Chen. The network helps show where Ming‐Hsien Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Hsien Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Hsien Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Hsien Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008163
2 2010100
3 200880
4 201252
5 200717
6 202215
7 20119
8 20208
9 20226
10 20145
11
Psychological Barriers and Prices Behaviour of TAIFEX Futures
20115
12 20022
13 20001
14 20240
15
Study Knowledge Flows Moving in Business Groups with the Perspectives of Organizational Learning
20070

About Ming‐Hsien Chen

Ming‐Hsien Chen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Information Systems, Finance, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 15 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (2 papers), Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods (1 paper) and Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations), Clinical Psychology (148 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (27 citations), Rehabilitation (27 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (75 citations). Ming‐Hsien Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Indonesia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kuei‐Min Chen, Chun‐Huw Li, Huey‐Shyan Lin, Hsuan‐Man Hung, Yi-Ting Huang, Yu‐Cheng Kao, Han-Lin Li, Nian‐Shing Chen, Hsiu‐Hung Wang and Fan‐Gang Tseng. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Review of Derivatives Research, Journal of Clinical Medicine and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact