Ming‐Chih Lee

47 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ming‐Chih Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Finance 172
  • General Energy 17
  • Economics and Econometrics 413
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 106
  • Aging 22
Replace Juan Carlos Molero with:
Juan Carlos Molero Australia
Xiuwen Chen China
Junyi Liu China
Ling Hu China
Jiaqian Chen China
Jiří Kukačka Czechia
Chen Ma China
Tianyi Wang China
Awais Anwar Pakistan
Aizhen Zhang China
Ming‐Chih Lee relative to Juan Carlos Molero Australia Juan Carlos Molero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Juan Carlos Molero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Chih Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Chih Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Chih Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Chih Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Chih Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Chih Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Chih Lee. The network helps show where Ming‐Chih Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Chih Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Chih Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Chih Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009206
2 2003169
3 2007132
4 2003103
5 200460
6 199258
7 201354
8 201344
9 201023
10 200822
11 202021
12 200517
13 200517
14 200616
15 202115
16 200814
17 200613
18 201513
19 200711
20 201411

About Ming‐Chih Lee

Ming‐Chih Lee is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (11 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (11 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (8 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (7 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (3 papers) and Ga2O3 and related materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (172 citations), General Energy (17 citations), Economics and Econometrics (413 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (106 citations) and Aging (22 citations). Ming‐Chih Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Ting-Huan Chang, Chien-Ming Huang, Jui‐Cheng Hung, Hung‐Chun Liu, Yoshihiro Ishikawa, Junichi Sadoshima, Satoshi Okumura, Jun-ichi Kawabe, Gen Takagi and Chull Hong. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Biotechnology, Circulation Research, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact