Ming‐Chi Tsai

1.1k total citations
19 papers, 609 citations indexed

About

Ming‐Chi Tsai is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ming‐Chi Tsai has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 609 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ming‐Chi Tsai's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Ming‐Chi Tsai is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Ming‐Chi Tsai collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Japan. Ming‐Chi Tsai's co-authors include Richard Krämer, Jacques I. Wadiche, Ping‐Hsiao Shih, Gow‐Chin Yen, Tuzz‐Ying Song, Yun‐Li Ma, Eminy H.Y. Lee, Henrique von Gersdorff, Stephanie Rudolph and Wan‐Chen Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Communications and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Ming‐Chi Tsai

19 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Ming‐Chi Tsai
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 317
  • Molecular Biology 267
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 87
  • Pharmacology 79
  • Materials Chemistry 72
Replace Che‐Chang Hsu with:
Che‐Chang Hsu United States
Rebeca Dı́ez-Alarcia Spain
Su Zhang China
Tomasz Boczek Poland
Hana Hayasaki Japan
Nathaniel Calloway United States
Shiu‐Hwa Yeh Taiwan
Emily Days United States
Mario Mezler Germany
J. Mark Treherne United Kingdom
Che‐Chang Hsu United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ming‐Chi Tsai
Ming‐Chi Tsai · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ming‐Chi Tsai
Ming‐Chi Tsai · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Chi Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Chi Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Chi Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Chi Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Chi Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Chi Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Chi Tsai. The network helps show where Ming‐Chi Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming‐Chi Tsai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming‐Chi Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming‐Chi Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming‐Chi Tsai. Ming‐Chi Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 9
2 56
3 5
4 20
5 60
6 19
7 31
8 63
9 63
10 24
11 29
12 25
13 82
14 40
15 32
16
Stability of self-prepared fortified antibiotic eyedrops.
3
17 30
18 14
19
Hypothermia and sepsis: the major causes of mortality in gastroschisis.
4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026