Ming Ni

543 citations
19 papers · 440 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 4
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 3
    • Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 4
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 2
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2

Ming Ni

18 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Ming Ni
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Oncology 229
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
  • Ophthalmology 38
  • Pharmacology 68
  • Pharmacology 24
Replace Hong Xin with:
Hong Xin United States
Jelena Zarić Switzerland
Li Tong China
A M Faussat France
Xiaoling Luo China
Ligang Jie China
Peace Mabeta South Africa
Xueting Shao China
Samiha Mateen United States
Saeeda O. Ahmed Saudi Arabia
Ming Ni relative to Hong Xin United States Hong Xin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Hong Xin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming Ni

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming Ni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming Ni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming Ni more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming Ni

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming Ni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming Ni. The network helps show where Ming Ni may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming Ni, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming Ni Line = papers co-authored together Ming Ni links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Crocin from Crocus sativus possesses significant anti-proliferation effects on human colorectal cancer cells.
2007176
2 201764
3 201147
4 202022
5 198821
6 201519
7 200917
8 200515
9 199015
10 199111
11 20139
12 19929
13 20168
14 20182
15 19892
16
Distribution of Newly Formed Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Related Cells in Rabbit Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV)
20031
17 20051
18 19981
19 20230

About Ming Ni

Ming Ni is a scholar working on Oncology, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Cancer Research, having authored 19 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (3 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (229 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations), Ophthalmology (38 citations), Pharmacology (68 citations) and Pharmacology (24 citations). Ming Ni has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Anna Fishbein, Jing Xie, Han Aung, Sangeeta R. Mehendale, Chun‐Su Yuan, Bruce Charles, John A. Duley, Ross Norris, Robert B. Nussenblatt and Andrew S. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Clinical Cancer Research, The FASEB Journal, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Journal of Liposome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact