Mina Singh

842 citations
37 papers · 599 indexed · h-index 13

Mina Singh

35 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Mina Singh
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Research and Theory 25
  • Rehabilitation 97
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Occupational Therapy 54
  • Oncology 226
Replace Karen Yates with:
Karen Yates Australia
Ana María Rodríguez Canada
Marci Catanzaro United States
Tracy Robinson Australia
Ali Dehghani Iran
Fatma Arıkan Türkiye
Elnaz Asghari Iran
Ayla Bayık Temel Türkiye
Weijie Xing China
Aleksandar Višnjić Serbia
Mina Singh relative to Karen Yates Australia Karen Yates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×22.6×
Karen Yates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mina Singh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mina Singh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mina Singh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mina Singh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mina Singh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mina Singh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mina Singh. The network helps show where Mina Singh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mina Singh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mina Singh Line = papers co-authored together Mina Singh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20231
4 20225
5 20224
6 20213
7 202137
8 20176
9
Parental Needs Rating By Parents and Nurses: Association With Illness Severity
20160
10 201645
11 20164
12
A New Era on the Horizon - Challenges and Implications of the NCLEX-RN Exam in Canada
20143
13 2014103
14 201412
15 201427
16 201026
17 2010101
18 200910
19
Psychosocial aspects of caregiving to stroke patients.
200516
20 200424

About Mina Singh

Mina Singh is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Leadership and Management, Rehabilitation and Family Practice, having authored 37 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (12 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (3 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (25 citations), Rehabilitation (97 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Occupational Therapy (54 citations) and Oncology (226 citations). Mina Singh has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christine Maheu, Sophie Lebel, Christine Courbasson, Cheryl Harris, Lynne Jolicoeur, Monique Lefèbvre, Rose Raizman, Connie Harris, Barbara M. Bates‐Jensen and Jill I. Cameron. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, International Nursing Review, Journal of Cancer Survivorship, Contemporary Family Therapy and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026