Min Zeng

7.0k citations
65 papers · 635 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 5
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 5
    • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy 7
    • Meningioma and schwannoma management 3

Min Zeng

61 papers receiving 627 citations

Peers

Min Zeng
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 31
  • Cancer Research 67
  • Epidemiology 152
  • Surgery 182
Replace Shuqing Jin with:
Shuqing Jin China
Xuxia Wei China
Ali Reza Ahmadi United States
Liao Pinhu China
Juncheng Wang China
Bryan Kluck United States
Hong-Tao Wang China
Lei Xin China
Guihong Liang China
Kang Liu China
Min Zeng relative to Shuqing Jin China Shuqing Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Shuqing Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Min Zeng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Min Zeng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min Zeng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min Zeng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Min Zeng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min Zeng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min Zeng. The network helps show where Min Zeng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Min Zeng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Min Zeng Line = papers co-authored together Min Zeng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201379
2 202237
3 202036
4 201935
5 201627
6 202127
7 202026
8 201921
9 201621
10 201620
11 201818
12 202317
13 201716
14 201916
15 202114
16 201714
17 202314
18 201812
19 201712
20 202210

About Min Zeng

Min Zeng is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (5 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (4 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (31 citations), Cancer Research (67 citations), Epidemiology (152 citations) and Surgery (182 citations). Min Zeng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xin Wei, Zhiyong Wu, Fei Yi, Jie Xie, Wei Li, Ping Wang, Bing Li, Yuming Peng, Haitao Long and Yong Zhu. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Medicine, International Journal of Surgery, International Orthopaedics and Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact