Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective
2009322 citationsFrank R. Baumgartner, Christian Breunig et al.American Journal of Political Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michiel Nuytemans
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michiel Nuytemans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michiel Nuytemans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michiel Nuytemans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michiel Nuytemans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michiel Nuytemans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michiel Nuytemans. The network helps show where Michiel Nuytemans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michiel Nuytemans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michiel Nuytemans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michiel Nuytemans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michiel Nuytemans. Michiel Nuytemans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Deschouwer, Kris, Stefaan Walgrave, & Michiel Nuytemans. (2011). Do the vote test. The Belgian voting aid application. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 135–142.8 indexed citations
3.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Christian Breunig, Christoffer Green‐Pedersen, et al.. (2009). Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science. 53(3). 603–620.322 indexed citations breakdown →
Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, Michiel Nuytemans, & Peter Van Aelst. (2008). Issue Ownership Dynamics: How Political Parties Claim and Maintain Issues Through Media Appearances. 1–37.1 indexed citations
Walgrave, Stefaan, Peter Van Aelst, & Michiel Nuytemans. (2008). Vote advice applications as new campaign players? Electoral effects of do the vote test at the 2004 regional elections in Belgium. 237–258.2 indexed citations
Aelst, Peter Van, Kees Brants, Philip van Praag, et al.. (2008). THE FOURTH ESTATE AS SUPERPOWER?. Journalism Studies. 9(4). 494–511.71 indexed citations
Aelst, Peter Van, Michiel Nuytemans, Jonas Lefevere, & Stefaan Walgrave. (2007). Lijst Dedecker: een gat in de politieke markt?. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 14(6). 12–16.1 indexed citations
Deschouwer, Kris & Michiel Nuytemans. (2005). De Stemtest van de VRT: een kijk in de keuken. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 2005. 13–31.4 indexed citations
15.
Swert, Knut De, Régis Dandoy, & Michiel Nuytemans. (2005). Bijlage: overzicht van de agenda’s. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 221–242.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.