Michelle Lyn

424 total citations
21 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Michelle Lyn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Lyn has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Health and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michelle Lyn's work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (7 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers). Michelle Lyn is often cited by papers focused on Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (7 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers). Michelle Lyn collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Michelle Lyn's co-authors include India J. Ornelas, Giselle Corbie‐Smith, Anh N. Tran, J. Lloyd Michener, Melissa J. Green, Mary T. Champagne, Mina Silberberg, Mimi Kim, Robert M. Califf and Kimberly S. H. Yarnall and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, BMC Public Health and Health Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Lyn

18 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Lyn United States 10 186 68 46 43 43 21 297
Vanessa Rose Australia 9 198 1.1× 59 0.9× 29 0.6× 37 0.9× 74 1.7× 23 350
Kathryn E. Gunter United States 13 253 1.4× 32 0.5× 57 1.2× 42 1.0× 68 1.6× 32 415
Ali Asghar Haeri Mehrizi Iran 10 148 0.8× 42 0.6× 20 0.4× 42 1.0× 48 1.1× 52 310
Kate Bosanquet United Kingdom 10 109 0.6× 54 0.8× 43 0.9× 23 0.5× 70 1.6× 18 303
Aremis Villalobos Mexico 12 172 0.9× 93 1.4× 28 0.6× 30 0.7× 117 2.7× 54 376
Jenny Zhen‐Duan United States 11 133 0.7× 131 1.9× 29 0.6× 32 0.7× 40 0.9× 41 284
Sandra Benavides‐Vaello United States 10 140 0.8× 51 0.8× 38 0.8× 22 0.5× 102 2.4× 17 333
Megan Clinch United Kingdom 9 174 0.9× 28 0.4× 20 0.4× 14 0.3× 59 1.4× 18 351
Bill Buron United States 10 275 1.5× 74 1.1× 13 0.3× 38 0.9× 103 2.4× 21 400
Michelle Sweet Australia 12 167 0.9× 49 0.7× 27 0.6× 31 0.7× 116 2.7× 30 352

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Lyn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Lyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Lyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Lyn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Lyn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Lyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Lyn. The network helps show where Michelle Lyn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Lyn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Lyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Lyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Lyn. Michelle Lyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bhavsar, Nrupen A., Jessica Sperling, Dinushika Mohottige, et al.. (2024). SEED: A novel web-based data visualization platform to visualize, communicate, and explore social, environmental, and equity drivers of health. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 8(1). e121–e121.
3.
Whitaker, Rebecca, Madlyn C. Morreale, Andrea Thoumi, et al.. (2024). Addressing Housing-Related Social Needs Through Medicaid: Lessons From North Carolina’s Healthy Opportunities Pilots Program. Health Affairs. 43(2). 190–199. 4 indexed citations
4.
Mohottige, Dinushika, Clemontina A. Davenport, Nrupen A. Bhavsar, et al.. (2023). Residential Structural Racism and Prevalence of Chronic Health Conditions. JAMA Network Open. 6(12). e2348914–e2348914. 23 indexed citations
5.
Lyn, Michelle, et al.. (2023). Community-based organizations’ perspectives on piloting health and social care integration in North Carolina. BMC Public Health. 23(1). 1914–1914. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lyn, Michelle, et al.. (2022). COVID Collaborations: A Physician Assistant Program and Health Department Partnership. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education. 33(3). 213–215.
7.
Simpson, Courtney C., et al.. (2022). Perceived Benefits of Training Clinicians in Community Engagement for a Leadership Development Program. Family Medicine. 54(2). 134–138. 3 indexed citations
8.
Viera, Anthony J., Matthew Case, Carol Epling, et al.. (2021). Partnerships to Care for Our Patients and Communities During COVID-19. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 34(5). 1003–1009. 1 indexed citations
9.
Silberberg, Mina, et al.. (2019). What Is Population Health?. Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice. 46(4). 475–484. 11 indexed citations
10.
Boulware, L. Ebony & Michelle Lyn. (2019). Who Will Drive the Change? Democratizing Health Data. American Journal of Public Health. 109(4). 547–548. 2 indexed citations
11.
Boulware, L. Ebony, Pamela Maxson, Nrupen A. Bhavsar, et al.. (2019). Democratizing health system data to impact social and environmental health contexts: a novel collaborative community data-sharing model. Journal of Public Health. 42(4). 784–792. 3 indexed citations
12.
Spratt, Susan E., Bryan C. Batch, Mark N. Feinglos, et al.. (2015). Methods and initial findings from the Durham Diabetes Coalition: Integrating geospatial health technology and community interventions to reduce death and disability. Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology. 2(1). 26–36. 23 indexed citations
13.
Tran, Anh N., et al.. (2012). Evaluation of Amigas Latinas Motivando el Alma (ALMA): A Pilot Promotora Intervention Focused on Stress and Coping Among Immigrant Latinas. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 16(2). 280–289. 28 indexed citations
14.
Ornelas, India J., et al.. (2012). Amigas Latinas Motivando el ALMA (ALMA). Californian Journal of Health Promotion. 10(SI-Latino). 52–64. 13 indexed citations
15.
Lyn, Michelle, et al.. (2011). Just for Us: In-Home Care for Frail Elderly and Disabled Individuals With Low Incomes. North Carolina Medical Journal. 72(3). 205–206. 2 indexed citations
16.
Cook, Jennifer, et al.. (2010). Community Collaboration To Improve Care And Reduce Health Disparities. Health Affairs. 29(5). 956–958. 13 indexed citations
17.
Corbie‐Smith, Giselle, et al.. (2010). Development of an Interinstitutional Collaboration to Support Community-Partnered Research Addressing the Health of Emerging Latino Populations. Academic Medicine. 85(4). 728–735. 16 indexed citations
18.
Michener, J. Lloyd, Michelle Lyn, Mary T. Champagne, et al.. (2008). Improving the Health of the Community: Duke??s Experience with Community Engagement. Academic Medicine. 83(4). 408–413. 46 indexed citations
19.
Sangvai, Devdutta, Michelle Lyn, & Lloyd Michener. (2008). Defining high-performance teams and physician leadership.. PubMed. 34(2). 44–51. 2 indexed citations
20.
Michener, J. Lloyd, et al.. (2006). Just for Us: An Academic Medical Center–Community Partnership to Maintain the Health of a Frail Low-Income Senior Population. The Gerontologist. 46(2). 271–276. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026