Michelle Luke

898 total citations
18 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

Michelle Luke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Luke has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Michelle Luke's work include Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 papers). Michelle Luke is often cited by papers focused on Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 papers). Michelle Luke collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Michelle Luke's co-authors include Katherine B. Carnelley, Constantine Sedikides, Gregory R. Maio, Colette R. Hirsch, Ian Dawson, Lowell Gaertner, J.E.V. Johnson, Erin M. O’Mara, Wing‐Yee Cheung and Constantine Sedikides and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Luke

18 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Luke United Kingdom 10 193 125 110 89 48 18 385
Roosevelt Vilar Brazil 11 144 0.7× 203 1.6× 92 0.8× 60 0.7× 65 1.4× 32 404
David Cwir United States 2 163 0.8× 161 1.3× 55 0.5× 75 0.8× 51 1.1× 2 421
Timo Heydasch Germany 9 164 0.8× 231 1.8× 214 1.9× 106 1.2× 59 1.2× 12 503
Kaori Karasawa Japan 12 194 1.0× 190 1.5× 68 0.6× 59 0.7× 50 1.0× 89 516
Asuka Komiya Japan 13 177 0.9× 154 1.2× 49 0.4× 140 1.6× 28 0.6× 31 449
Anne L. Zell United States 11 246 1.3× 226 1.8× 187 1.7× 89 1.0× 125 2.6× 13 517
Jina Park United States 8 187 1.0× 106 0.8× 84 0.8× 85 1.0× 64 1.3× 18 421
Gennaro Pica Italy 13 151 0.8× 133 1.1× 83 0.8× 98 1.1× 125 2.6× 34 401
George C. Smith United States 8 186 1.0× 142 1.1× 63 0.6× 129 1.4× 68 1.4× 19 507
Misook Kang United States 2 276 1.4× 181 1.4× 68 0.6× 66 0.7× 43 0.9× 3 446

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Luke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Luke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Luke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Luke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Luke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Luke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Luke. The network helps show where Michelle Luke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Luke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Luke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Luke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Luke. Michelle Luke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Luke, Michelle, Katherine B. Carnelley, & Constantine Sedikides. (2019). Attachments in the workplace: How attachment security in the workplace benefits the organisation. European Journal of Social Psychology. 50(5). 1046–1064. 12 indexed citations
2.
Sedikides, Constantine, Michelle Luke, & Erica G. Hepper. (2016). Enhancing feedback and improving feedback: subjective perceptions, psychological consequences, behavioral outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 46(12). 687–700. 8 indexed citations
3.
Dawson, Ian, J.E.V. Johnson, & Michelle Luke. (2016). One Too Many? Understanding the Influence of Risk Factor Quantity on Perceptions of Risk. Risk Analysis. 37(6). 1157–1169. 4 indexed citations
4.
Guzman-Castillo, Maria, Sally Brailsford, Michelle Luke, & Honora Smith. (2015). A tutorial on selecting and interpreting predictive models for ordinal health-related outcomes. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology. 15(3-4). 223–240. 12 indexed citations
5.
Dawson, Ian, J.E.V. Johnson, & Michelle Luke. (2014). Using risk model judgements to better understand perceptions of synergistic risks. British Journal of Psychology. 105(4). 581–603. 5 indexed citations
6.
Cheung, Wing‐Yee, Michelle Luke, & Gregory R. Maio. (2014). On attitudes towards humanity and climate change: The effects of humanity esteem and self‐transcendence values on environmental concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology. 44(5). 496–506. 31 indexed citations
7.
Sedikides, Constantine, Lowell Gaertner, Michelle Luke, Erin M. O’Mara, & Jochen E. Gebauer. (2013). A Three Tier Hierarchy of Motivational Self-Potency: Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self. 48. 18 indexed citations
8.
Ojiako, Udechukwu, Alasdair Marshall, Michelle Luke, & Maxwell Chipulu. (2012). Managing Competition Risk: A Critical Realist Philosophical Exploration. Competition & Change. 16(2). 130–149. 6 indexed citations
9.
Dawson, Ian, J.E.V. Johnson, & Michelle Luke. (2012). Helping Individuals to Understand Synergistic Risks: An Assessment of Message Contents Depicting Mechanistic and Probabilistic Concepts. Risk Analysis. 33(5). 851–865. 11 indexed citations
10.
Gaertner, Lowell, Constantine Sedikides, Michelle Luke, et al.. (2012). A motivational hierarchy within: Primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48(5). 997–1013. 62 indexed citations
11.
Luke, Michelle, Constantine Sedikides, & Katherine B. Carnelley. (2012). Your Love Lifts Me Higher! The Energizing Quality of Secure Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 38(6). 721–733. 82 indexed citations
12.
Dawson, Ian, J.E.V. Johnson, & Michelle Luke. (2011). Subjective judgements of synergistic risks: A cognitive reasoning perspective. British Journal of Psychology. 103(2). 203–223. 7 indexed citations
13.
Dawson, Ian, J.E.V. Johnson, & Michelle Luke. (2011). Do People Believe Combined Hazards Can Present Synergistic Risks?. Risk Analysis. 32(5). 801–815. 9 indexed citations
14.
Luke, Michelle, et al.. (2010). Constructing a self: The role of self-structure and self-certainty in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 48(10). 955–965. 60 indexed citations
15.
Luke, Michelle & Gregory R. Maio. (2009). Oh the humanity! Humanity-esteem and its social importance. Journal of Research in Personality. 43(4). 586–601. 20 indexed citations
16.
Gaertner, Lowell, et al.. (2009). Motivational primacy in the tripartite self: where in lies the relational self?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
17.
Luke, Michelle, Gregory R. Maio, & Katherine B. Carnelley. (2004). Attachment models of the self and others: Relations with self‐esteem, humanity‐esteem, and parental treatment. Personal Relationships. 11(3). 281–303. 36 indexed citations
18.
Luke, Michelle, Gregory R. Maio, & Katherine B. Carnelley. (2002). O' the humanity: the development of the Humanity-Esteem Scale. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026