Michelle Luke

911 citations
18 papers · 388 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michelle Luke

18 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Michelle Luke
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 43
  • Social Psychology 185
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Clinical Psychology 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 121
Replace David Cwir with:
David Cwir United States
Roosevelt Vilar Brazil
Kristin A. Lane United States
Jennifer Tong Hong Kong
Jina Park United States
Daniel Ehlebracht Germany
Timo Heydasch Germany
Matthias Donat Germany
Luís Oceja Spain
Amy S. Ebesu Hubbard United States
Michelle Luke relative to David Cwir United States David Cwir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
David Cwir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Luke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Luke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Luke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Luke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Luke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Luke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Luke. The network helps show where Michelle Luke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Luke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michelle Luke Line = papers co-authored together Michelle Luke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201283
2 201263
3 201061
4 200436
5 201432
6 200920
7
A Three Tier Hierarchy of Motivational Self-Potency: Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self
201318
8 201912
9 201512
10 201211
11 20119
12 20167
13 20117
14 20126
15 20145
16 20164
17
O' the humanity: the development of the Humanity-Esteem Scale
20021
18
Motivational primacy in the tripartite self: where in lies the relational self?
20091

About Michelle Luke

Michelle Luke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (43 citations), Social Psychology (185 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), Clinical Psychology (94 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (121 citations). Michelle Luke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Gregory R. Maio, Constantine Sedikides, Katherine B. Carnelley, Colette R. Hirsch, Lusia Stopa, Lowell Gaertner, Ian Dawson, J.E.V. Johnson, Erin M. O’Mara and Wing‐Yee Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as Risk Analysis, British Journal of Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact