Timo Heydasch

847 total citations
12 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

Timo Heydasch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Timo Heydasch has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Timo Heydasch's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Timo Heydasch is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers). Timo Heydasch collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Denmark. Timo Heydasch's co-authors include Ingo Zettler, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Karl‐Heinz Renner, Morten Moshagen and Astrid Schütz and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Research in Personality and Journal of Personality Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Timo Heydasch

12 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Timo Heydasch

SPS

CP

SP

SR

CN

Matthias Donat Germany

Oumar Barry Senegal

Betty S. Witcher United States

Asuka Komiya Japan

Karyn L. Lewis United States

Ana I. Gheorghiu United Kingdom

David Cwir United States

Misook Kang United States

Luís Oceja Spain

Alek Chakroff United States

Matthias Donat Germany

Timo Heydasch

192 ×0.8

SPS

115 ×0.5

CP

265 ×1.6

SP

59 ×0.5

SR

51 ×0.5

CN

Citations per year, relative to Timo Heydasch Timo Heydasch (= 1×) peers Matthias Donat

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Heydasch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Heydasch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Heydasch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Heydasch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Heydasch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Heydasch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Heydasch. The network helps show where Timo Heydasch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timo Heydasch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timo Heydasch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timo Heydasch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timo Heydasch. Timo Heydasch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Heydasch, Timo, et al.. (2022). Dominance and Prestige as Self-Concept Facets. Journal of Personality Assessment. 105(5). 590–609. 9 indexed citations

2.

Heydasch, Timo, et al.. (2021). It’s All About Power. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 38(1). 36–48. 16 indexed citations

3.

Heydasch, Timo, et al.. (2020). German Personal Sense of Power Scale (GPSPS). OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations

4.

Heydasch, Timo, et al.. (2020). Translation - The Short Version of the Hagen Matrices Test (HMT-S): A 6-Item Induction Intelligence Test. 7(2). 23. 2 indexed citations

5.

Heydasch, Timo, et al.. (2017). The Short Version of the Hagen Matrices Test (HMT-S): 6-Item Induction Intelligence Test. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 7(2). 26. 19 indexed citations

6.

Hilbig, Benjamin E., Timo Heydasch, & Ingo Zettler. (2014). To boast or not to boast: Testing the humility aspect of the Honesty–Humility factor. Personality and Individual Differences. 69. 12–16. 16 indexed citations

7.

Zettler, Ingo, Benjamin E. Hilbig, & Timo Heydasch. (2013). Two sides of one coin: Honesty–Humility and situational factors mutually shape social dilemma decision making. Journal of Research in Personality. 47(4). 286–295. 79 indexed citations

8.

Hilbig, Benjamin E., et al.. (2012). It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences. 54(5). 598–603. 147 indexed citations

9.

Renner, Karl‐Heinz, et al.. (2012). Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks. 7 indexed citations

10.

Hilbig, Benjamin E., Ingo Zettler, Morten Moshagen, & Timo Heydasch. (2012). Tracing the Path from Personality — via Cooperativeness — to Conservation. European Journal of Personality. 27(4). 319–327. 77 indexed citations

11.

Hilbig, Benjamin E., Ingo Zettler, & Timo Heydasch. (2011). Personality, Punishment and Public Goods: Strategic Shifts towards Cooperation as a Matter of Dispositional Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality. 26(3). 245–254. 99 indexed citations

12.

Renner, Karl‐Heinz & Timo Heydasch. (2010). Performing humor: On the relations between self-presentation styles, gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact