Michelle Locke
- Surgery top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmaceutical Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- P. Rod DunbarJingyuan WenJames R. FalconerJohn A. WindsorVaughan FeisstSara M. HanningShuo ChenAnand K. Deva
- Topics
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction (10 papers)Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (9 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Applied Physiology
- Partner nations
- New ZealandAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michelle Locke
32 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Surgery 789
- Genetics 334
- Cancer Research 283
- Molecular Biology 251
- Pharmaceutical Science 219
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Locke
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Locke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Locke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Locke. The network helps show where Michelle Locke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Locke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Locke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Locke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Locke. Michelle Locke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Recent advances in non-ionic surfactant vesicles (niosomes): Fabrication, characterization, pharmaceutical and cosmetic applicationsbreakdown → | 328 |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | Limiting complication rates in implant-based breast reconstruction. | 1 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 251 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | Patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction surgery in a public hospital: use of the Breast-Q questionnaire. | 11 |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 203 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 75 |
About Michelle Locke
Michelle Locke is a scholar working on Dermatology, Emergency Medical Services and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Implant and Reconstruction (10 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (9 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (219 citations), Genetics (334 citations) and Cancer Research (283 citations). Michelle Locke has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Rod Dunbar, Jingyuan Wen, James R. Falconer, John A. Windsor, Vaughan Feisst, Sara M. Hanning, Shuo Chen, Anand K. Deva, Mark Magnusson and Rodney D. Cooter. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.