Michelle Lewis

2.2k total citations
24 papers, 528 citations indexed

About

Michelle Lewis is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Lewis has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 528 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 9 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 6 papers in Clinical Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Michelle Lewis's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers). Michelle Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers). Michelle Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Michelle Lewis's co-authors include Aaron J. Goldenberg, Jeffrey R. Botkin, Erin Rothwell, Rebecca Anderson, Nora Shields, Casey L. Peiris, Bob Wong, Louisa A. Stark, Matthew J. Burbank and Daniel Merenstein and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Lewis

24 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Michelle Lewis
Hannah Fraser United Kingdom
Marie Deverell Australia
Richard V. Weiss United States
Helen M. Shields United States
Jane R. MacKinnon United Kingdom
M Isokoski Finland
Joseph Becker United States
Catherine Walker United Kingdom
Hannah Fraser United Kingdom
Michelle Lewis
Citations per year, relative to Michelle Lewis Michelle Lewis (= 1×) peers Hannah Fraser

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Lewis. The network helps show where Michelle Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Lewis. Michelle Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Raraigh, Karen S., Michelle Lewis, Joseph M. Collaco, et al.. (2022). Caution advised in the use of CFTR modulator treatment for individuals harboring specific CFTR variants. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 21(5). 856–860. 6 indexed citations
3.
Bonham, Vence L., Ellen Wright Clayton, Stephanie Johnson, et al.. (2021). Ethical issues in genetics and infectious diseases research: An interdisciplinary expert review. Ethics Medicine and Public Health. 18. 100684–100684. 3 indexed citations
4.
Raraigh, Karen S., Matthew J. Pellicore, Emily F. Davis-Marcisak, et al.. (2019). Correlating Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Function with Clinical Features to Inform Precision Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 199(9). 1116–1126. 66 indexed citations
5.
Lewis, Michelle. (2018). Should Genetic Testing for Variants Associated with Influenza Infection Be Mandatory for Health Care Employees?. The AMA Journal of Ethic. 20(9). E819–825. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lewis, Michelle, Casey L. Peiris, & Nora Shields. (2016). Long-term home and community-based exercise programs improve function in community-dwelling older people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy. 63(1). 23–29. 45 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, Michelle, et al.. (2015). Active Learning through a Debate Series in a First-Year Pharmacy Self-Care Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 79(2). 25–25. 34 indexed citations
8.
Lewis, Michelle & Aaron J. Goldenberg. (2015). Return of Results from Research Using Newborn Screening Dried Blood Samples. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 43(3). 559–568. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lewis, Michelle. (2015). Lessons from the Residual Newborn Screening Dried Blood Sample Litigation. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 43(S1). 32–35. 8 indexed citations
10.
Geller, Gail, Rachel Dvoskin, Chloe L. Thio, et al.. (2014). Genomics and infectious disease: a call to identify the ethical, legal and social implications for public health and clinical practice. Genome Medicine. 6(11). 106–106. 21 indexed citations
11.
Southwick, Frederick S., Michelle Lewis, Kartikeya Cherabuddi, et al.. (2014). Applying Athletic Principles to Medical Rounds to Improve Teaching and Patient Care. Academic Medicine. 89(7). 1018–1023. 18 indexed citations
12.
Lewis, Michelle. (2013). Laboratory Specimens and Genetic Privacy: Evolution of Legal Theory. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 41(S1). 65–68. 2 indexed citations
13.
Rothwell, Erin, Rebecca Anderson, Aaron J. Goldenberg, et al.. (2012). Assessing public attitudes on the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples: A focus group study. Social Science & Medicine. 74(8). 1305–1309. 31 indexed citations
14.
Botkin, Jeffrey R., Aaron J. Goldenberg, Erin Rothwell, Rebecca Anderson, & Michelle Lewis. (2012). Retention and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Bloodspots. PEDIATRICS. 131(1). 120–127. 40 indexed citations
15.
Lewis, Michelle, Michael E. Scheurer, Robert C. Green, & Amy L. McGuire. (2012). Research Results: Preserving Newborn Blood Samples. Science Translational Medicine. 4(159). 159cm12–159cm12. 16 indexed citations
16.
Botkin, Jeffrey R., Erin Rothwell, Rebecca Anderson, et al.. (2012). Public Attitudes Regarding the Use of Residual Newborn Screening Specimens for Research. PEDIATRICS. 129(2). 231–238. 55 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, Michelle, Aaron J. Goldenberg, Rebecca Anderson, Erin Rothwell, & Jeffrey R. Botkin. (2011). State Laws Regarding the Retention and Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Samples. PEDIATRICS. 127(4). 703–712. 62 indexed citations
18.
Rothwell, Erin, Matthew J. Burbank, Aaron J. Goldenberg, et al.. (2011). Concerns of Newborn Blood Screening Advisory Committee Members Regarding Storage and Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots. American Journal of Public Health. 101(11). 2111–2116. 23 indexed citations
19.
Wang, Annie, Kevan G. Lewis, Michelle Lewis, & Leslie Robinson‐Bostom. (2008). Papillary dermal elastosis: a unique elastic tissue disorder or an unusual manifestation of pseudoxanthoma elasticum‐like papillary dermal elastolysis?. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 36(9). 1010–1013. 17 indexed citations
20.
Lewis, Michelle, John K. Gohagan, & Daniel Merenstein. (2007). The Locality Rule and the Physician's Dilemma. JAMA. 297(23). 2633–2633. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026