Micheline Kergoat
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 1%
- Surgery top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bernard PorthaDanielle BailbéGrégory LacrazF. Homo‐DelarcheSophie Hallakou‐BozecDavid E. MollerSébastien BolzeM.H. Giroix
- Topics
- Pancreatic function and diabetes (24 papers)Diabetes and associated disorders (13 papers)Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Micheline Kergoat
42 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.2k
- Surgery 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 925
- Physiology 512
- Genetics 495
Countries citing papers authored by Micheline Kergoat
This map shows the geographic impact of Micheline Kergoat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Micheline Kergoat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Micheline Kergoat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Micheline Kergoat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Micheline Kergoat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Micheline Kergoat. The network helps show where Micheline Kergoat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Micheline Kergoat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Micheline Kergoat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Micheline Kergoat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Micheline Kergoat. Micheline Kergoat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 59 | |
| 3 | 127 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 291 | |
| 9 | 58 | |
| 10 | 108 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Micheline Kergoat
Micheline Kergoat is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biological Psychiatry and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (24 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (13 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.2k citations), Surgery (1.1k citations) and Physiology (512 citations). Micheline Kergoat has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Portha, Danielle Bailbé, Grégory Lacraz, F. Homo‐Delarche, Sophie Hallakou‐Bozec, David E. Moller, Sébastien Bolze, M.H. Giroix, L Doaré and Jan A. Ehses. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.